2016
DOI: 10.1108/ijrd-12-2015-0033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Becoming a PI: agency, persistence and some luck!

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to examine the experience of gaining research independence by becoming a principal investigator (PI) – an aspiration for many post-PhD researchers about whom little is known. It provides insight into this experience by using a qualitative narrative approach to document how 60 PIs from a range of disciplines in one European and two UK universities experienced working towards and achieving this significant goal. Design/methodology/approach Within the context of a semi-structured intervi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…activating mentoring networks involved all three dimensions). Our findings (particularly the “rallying” phase) also add to literature illuminating resilience, agency, efficacy and persistence among researchers and faculty members in higher education (McAlpine et al , 2016; McIntyre and Hellstein, 2014; Niehaus et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…activating mentoring networks involved all three dimensions). Our findings (particularly the “rallying” phase) also add to literature illuminating resilience, agency, efficacy and persistence among researchers and faculty members in higher education (McAlpine et al , 2016; McIntyre and Hellstein, 2014; Niehaus et al , 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…Our process included three phases: recognizing, rallying and resolving. Similar to Evans’s (2011) initial stage and McAlpine et al ’s (2016) finding regarding emotional dimensions of researcher development, our “recognizing” phase involved coming to terms with elements of our practice that were falling short (e.g. responding to reviewer feedback and grappling with multiple theoretical perspectives).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Part of the interview (central to this analysis) was a detailed explanation of the positive and negative events reported in the survey (from the beginning of the PhD), which allowed situating significant events within their broader experiences. To examine how significant events may be experienced in a shorter temporality, interviewees were also asked to create a journey plot, a visual method (McAlpine, 2016; McAlpine et al , 2016). The use of visual methods within an interview is considered well suited to capturing experiences with related emotions through time (Miller and Brimicombe, 2003).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fellows' reflections on their journeys appeared to indicate that luck, fortune or serendipity were important parts of the story. For instance, finding themselves in a priority area during their postdoc years (Araújo, 2009;McAlpine et al, 2016), could be considered a windfall although luck and novelty should be considered as sufficiently distinctive and this distinction may make all the difference between a successful and a rejected fellowship proposal:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%