2022
DOI: 10.3126/kmcj.v4i2.47727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Becoming an Autonomous Learner in Nepalese EFL Context An Autoethnographic Study

Abstract: This autoethnographic study explores the researcher’s own perceptions on learner autonomy in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) context of Nepal. I collected the data from my experiences of learning English at Master’s level education in a campus from Kailali district under Tribhuvan University of Nepal. Using the autoethnographic research design of qualitative research, I conducted the study. More specifically, the data consisted of seven diaries written from March 2018 to April 2021. This study substantiate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For this, the available documents have been extracted from Gurung (2014) for major text and Jora (2021) for the way of interpretation and analysis. Furthermore, I consulted different books and materials such as Bennis (1959), Sarachek (1968), Hanna, Abrahams, Crumrine, Dirks, Von Gizycki, Heyer, Shapiro, Ikegami, Kaeppler, Kealiinohomoku, Kubik, Lange, Royce, Sweet, & Wild (1979, Wade, Jones, Van Zile, Higgins, Qureshi, Owens, & Flora (1987), Pargetter (1990), Bénabou & Tirole (2002), Schechner (2004, Neupane (2012), Gurung (2014), Bhandari (2016), Pier (2016), Thapa (2016), Wallenius (2017), MCGLYNN & KELLY (2018), Acharya & Acharya (2022) and Dhami (2022) as the sources using the convenient procedure to bring this study in this format. Moreover, the study analyzed the Gha͂ tu site from a symbolic point of view.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this, the available documents have been extracted from Gurung (2014) for major text and Jora (2021) for the way of interpretation and analysis. Furthermore, I consulted different books and materials such as Bennis (1959), Sarachek (1968), Hanna, Abrahams, Crumrine, Dirks, Von Gizycki, Heyer, Shapiro, Ikegami, Kaeppler, Kealiinohomoku, Kubik, Lange, Royce, Sweet, & Wild (1979, Wade, Jones, Van Zile, Higgins, Qureshi, Owens, & Flora (1987), Pargetter (1990), Bénabou & Tirole (2002), Schechner (2004, Neupane (2012), Gurung (2014), Bhandari (2016), Pier (2016), Thapa (2016), Wallenius (2017), MCGLYNN & KELLY (2018), Acharya & Acharya (2022) and Dhami (2022) as the sources using the convenient procedure to bring this study in this format. Moreover, the study analyzed the Gha͂ tu site from a symbolic point of view.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%