2022
DOI: 10.1080/13621025.2022.2077569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Becoming digital citizens: covid-19 and urban citizenship regimes in India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In reaction to diverse pressures (simplistically definable in terms such as neoliberalism, globalisation, digital platformisation, social inequality, economic rescaling, migration flows, spatial segregation and invasive tech corporate control), urban citizenship is emerging to better reflect the hybridisation of identity, participation and entitlement to focus on the concrete capacity to act politically both in material and immaterial realms. Urban citizenship could reflect the political capacity and right to 'use' the city and its embedded digital platforms in the presence of different regimes of citizenship (Iyer and Kuriakose, 2023). This is a form of biopolitical governance (Collier, 2011), since if digital platforms seek to shape the behaviour and norms of citizens in the context of platform urbanisation, this process can involve promoting specific forms of participation or citizenship that counteract government objectives.…”
Section: Techno-politics and Hybrid Norms Of Urban Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reaction to diverse pressures (simplistically definable in terms such as neoliberalism, globalisation, digital platformisation, social inequality, economic rescaling, migration flows, spatial segregation and invasive tech corporate control), urban citizenship is emerging to better reflect the hybridisation of identity, participation and entitlement to focus on the concrete capacity to act politically both in material and immaterial realms. Urban citizenship could reflect the political capacity and right to 'use' the city and its embedded digital platforms in the presence of different regimes of citizenship (Iyer and Kuriakose, 2023). This is a form of biopolitical governance (Collier, 2011), since if digital platforms seek to shape the behaviour and norms of citizens in the context of platform urbanisation, this process can involve promoting specific forms of participation or citizenship that counteract government objectives.…”
Section: Techno-politics and Hybrid Norms Of Urban Citizenshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In India, 100 cities have been selected for rapid and comprehensive digitization as part of the smart city framework (Kylasam Iyer & Kuriakose, 2023). Bengaluru, in the southern state of Karnataka, is one of the foremost among them.…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acknowledging the particularities of the Global South in relation to the Global North is necessary to solve a great number of problems [28]. Shockingly, COVID-19 made all world citizens pandemic citizens, sharing the same fear, uncertainty, and risks regardless of their location in the world [29][30][31]. However, it was unlikely that the pandemic crisis and its algorithmic disruptive vulnerabilities equally affected citizens in the Global South and the Global North.…”
Section: Literature Review: the State-of-the-art On Smart Cities (Sc)...mentioning
confidence: 99%