2022
DOI: 10.1017/hyp.2021.68
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Becoming with Toxicity: Chemical Epigenetics as “Racializing and Sexualizing Assemblage”

Abstract: In this article I think through Black feminism and queer theory to critically analyze toxicology. I focus on toxicology's conception of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs), a class of toxicants that can cause epigenetic changes leading to inheritable health issues. I suggest that Black feminist interventions are particularly necessary for the study of toxicants because multiply marginalized populations are disproportionately more exposed to EDCs. The structural preconditions that generate this uneven, racial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 62 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past two decades, though, toxicological research has developed outside this core of toxicological risk assessment practice. Biologists have appropriated the problem of toxicity, toxics, and mechanisms of contamination without necessarily fully entering the area of disciplinary toxicology and claiming the label of ‘toxicologist.’ Emerging biological facts such as endocrine disruption—not a discovery of toxicologists but of academic endocrinologists—have come to disrupt dose thinking, a core method and assumptions of the basic science of poisons (Packer, 2022). Knowledge produced about exposure to chemicals, either by emerging epigenetic research (Le Goff et al, 2022), or civic testing and measurement programs (Murphy, 2008), also arose and were marked as outside the increasingly demarcated core (and admittedly conservative) form of toxicology (Myers et al, 2009).…”
Section: Social Organization Of Research and Engagement In Scientific...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past two decades, though, toxicological research has developed outside this core of toxicological risk assessment practice. Biologists have appropriated the problem of toxicity, toxics, and mechanisms of contamination without necessarily fully entering the area of disciplinary toxicology and claiming the label of ‘toxicologist.’ Emerging biological facts such as endocrine disruption—not a discovery of toxicologists but of academic endocrinologists—have come to disrupt dose thinking, a core method and assumptions of the basic science of poisons (Packer, 2022). Knowledge produced about exposure to chemicals, either by emerging epigenetic research (Le Goff et al, 2022), or civic testing and measurement programs (Murphy, 2008), also arose and were marked as outside the increasingly demarcated core (and admittedly conservative) form of toxicology (Myers et al, 2009).…”
Section: Social Organization Of Research and Engagement In Scientific...mentioning
confidence: 99%