It was a pleasure reading the work of GATTINONI et al. [1] dedicated to the pathophysiological mechanisms of hypoxaemia observed in coronavirus disease 2019 patients. The authors recommend treating the hypoxaemia observed in the early stages of COVID-19 based on ventilation/perfusion (Vʹ A /Qʹ) mismatch.According to the laws of physics, increasing fractional concentration of oxygen in inspired gas (F IO 2 ) can increase arterial blood oxygen saturation (S aO 2 ) in case of Vʹ A /Qʹ <1. Also, it should be recognised that oxygen, as an important homotropic allosteric effector, favours the stabilisation of the quaternary R (relaxed) state of haemoglobin (Hb) allowing for an increase in S aO 2 by a positive feedback mechanism (binding of oxygen to Hb facilitates binding of new oxygen molecules). These biochemical processes may improve the S aO 2 in patients with decreased Hb-O 2 affinity in alveolar capillaries without any Vʹ A /Qʹ mismatch. Therefore, in cases of "happy" hypoxia or silent hypoxaemia, an exaggerated increase in S aO 2 with minimal hyperoxia may take place due to the allosteric effects of oxygen rather than Vʹ A /Qʹ maldistribution. Also, a high level of oxygen dependency is commonly seen in all stages of COVID-19 with frequent use of high F IO 2 without of development of atelectasis in the hypoventilated areas of the lungs, which also can't be explained by the Vʹ A /Qʹ mismatch.A discussion of CO 2 gas exchange mechanisms will further clarify the course of events resulting in hypoxaemia in COVID-19 patients. The remarkable increase in tidal volume in a patient with COVID-19 can be understood from the biochemical point of view: elimination of CO 2 , which is a strong heterotropic allosteric effector, will result in stabilisation of Hb's R state and assists its complete oxygenation.As we know, during hypoventilation, the gases are balanced in the alveolar-capillary space. Hence, a decreased Vʹ A /Qʹ ratio will result in a higher alveolar (P ACO 2 ) and arterial carbon dioxide tension (P aCO 2 ), but won't change the P aCO 2 and end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (P ETCO 2 ) gap [2]. Also, due to the low resistance to diffusion of CO 2 , P aCO 2 -P ETCO 2 gap is maintained unchanged in cases when patients have oxygen diffusion limitations [3]. Surprisingly, COVID-19 patients may achieve a high P aCO 2 -P ETCO 2 gap, sometimes exceeding the predicted cut-off values of mortality in non-COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients (i.e. 10-15 mmHg) [4]. Observing the data presented by VIOLA et al. [5] in type L COVID-19 pneumonia patients, we have found a median P aCO 2 -P ETCO 2 gap for supine position of 20.6 mmHg and 14.9 mmHg for prone position. BUSANA et al. [6] reported a P aCO 2 -P ETCO 2 gap of 15 mmHg in COVID-19 patients who need a high F IO 2 to maintain S aO 2 . In critically ill COVID-19 patients, as presented by CHEN et al. [7], the P aCO 2 -P ETCO 2 gap is reached at very high levels of 33 mmHg (18-40 mmHg). So, considering excessively high levels of the P aCO 2 -P ETCO 2 g...