2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2018.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bedside Menu Ordering System increases energy and protein intake while decreasing plate waste and food costs in hospital patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
55
1
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
4
55
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Plate waste remained the same for both the PM and BMOS cohorts. This contrasts with other studies, which have shown a reduction in plate waste with the introduction of BMOS (13,15) . However, the average plate waste of 34-35% for both cohorts is consistent with other published studies (6,23) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plate waste remained the same for both the PM and BMOS cohorts. This contrasts with other studies, which have shown a reduction in plate waste with the introduction of BMOS (13,15) . However, the average plate waste of 34-35% for both cohorts is consistent with other published studies (6,23) .…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study, patients ordering by BMOS ordered and consumed more food compared to the PM. Similar to the findings of previous studies , dietary intake increased significantly for both energy and protein intake. The increases could be a result of the BMOS being available 24/7 for patient ordering, as well as the ability to order as little as one meal in advance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Barrington et al found that a patient‐directed eBMOS led to significantly higher mean daily energy intake 6457 ± 3069 kJ vs 4805 ± 2028 kJ ( P < .001) and protein intake 72.3 ± 36.7 g vs 57.7 ± 26.9 g ( P < .001) compared with a TM. Similarly, two staff‐deployed eBMOS models found a significantly higher mean daily energy intake compared with TMs 8273 ± 2043 kJ vs 6273 ± 1818 kJ ( P < .001); and 6232 ± 2523 kJ vs 5513 ± 2212 kJ ( P = .04) . Likewise, these two studies also found mean daily protein intake was significantly higher with eBMOS compared with TMs 83 ± 24 g compared with 66 ± 25 g ( P = .01); and 78 ± 36 g compared with 53 ± 24 g ( P < .001) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Three studies evaluated the impact of a patient‐directed eBMOS (terminology including BMOS/e‐menu/TV menu) and the other two studies reported on staff‐deployed eBMOS . One study was conducted using an observational point prevalence approach, with the remainder conducted using of pre‐ and post‐test study designs (Table ). Sample sizes investigated across included studies ranged from 50 participants to 860 participants.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, hospitalized patients are ill and many experience appetite suppression, which results in large amounts of uneaten food (Lazell, 2016;McAdams, von Massow, Gallant, & Hayhoe, 2019;Williams & Walton, 2011). Thus, unique food delivery systems that are found to be successful in healthcare settings (McCray, Maunder, Norris, Moir, & MacKenzie-Shalders, 2018;Williams & Walton, 2011) may not apply to other settings. Second, the MM nurse researcher found that hospital food waste is predominantly disposed of via sink and not recorded.…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Team Work--a Case Exemplarmentioning
confidence: 99%