2019
DOI: 10.7326/m19-0812
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Bedside Optic Nerve Ultrasonography for Diagnosing Increased Intracranial Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
34
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
0
34
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a 0.075 mm measurement error is much lower than previously reported values of interobserver variability of ±0.2 mm (30). Furthermore, this small measurement error is insignificant in comparison to the variation in reported ONSD measurement threshold values which vary as much as 1 mm in the literature (31). Some authors contend that a trend in increasing repeated ONSD measurements or extreme values is more useful in diagnosis to account for these measurement uncertainties (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, a 0.075 mm measurement error is much lower than previously reported values of interobserver variability of ±0.2 mm (30). Furthermore, this small measurement error is insignificant in comparison to the variation in reported ONSD measurement threshold values which vary as much as 1 mm in the literature (31). Some authors contend that a trend in increasing repeated ONSD measurements or extreme values is more useful in diagnosis to account for these measurement uncertainties (32).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 71 studies, inclusive of adult and pediatric populations, report pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio of ONSD measurements to be 97% (95% CI 92-99%), 86% (CI 74-93%), 6.93 (CI 3.55-13.54), and 0.04 (CI 0.02-0.10), respectively [10]. However, in contrast to our study, the included papers used in their meta-analysis predominantly come from a patient population with known intracranial pathology (18 with traumatic brain injury, 26 without and 27 mixed).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies found that increase in ONSD correlates with increase in ICP [6][7][8][9]. Meta-analyses and systematic reviews support use of ONSD as a non-invasive ICP assessment modality [10]. However, different studies report variable inter-rater agreement and wide confidence intervals in measurements, suggesting caution-pending larger and more comprehensive studies [3,11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 1 Still, ICP monitoring is invasive and requires insertion of a probe or catheter into the intracranial compartment, thereby carrying a risk of complications. 2 , 3 A wide range of noninvasive methods of measuring the static and pulsatile components of ICP have been explored, 1 , 4 11 but so far, none have been found clinically suitable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%