Abstract:Background and Aim: Acute variceal bleeding (AVB) is a fatal adverse event of cirrhosis, and endoscopic band ligation (EBL) is the standard treatment for AVB. We developed a novel bedside risk-scoring model to predict the 6-week mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing EBL for AVB. Methods: Cox regression analysis was used to assess the relationship of clinical, biological, and endoscopic variables with the 6-week mortality risk after EBL in a derivation cohort (n = 1373). The primary outcome was the predict… Show more
“…The rate of HI/shock ranged between 1.2% and 68.3% of the eligible studies. The source of bleeding was UGIB in 54 of the included studies, [8][9][10][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]36,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][47][48][49][50][52][53][54][55][58][59][60][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]…”
Section: Basic Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
Background: Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a life-threatening event. Around 20–30% of patients with GIB will develop hemodynamic instability (HI). Objectives: We aimed to quantify HI as a risk factor for the development of relevant end points in acute GIB. Design: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases in October 2021. Data sources and methods: Studies of GIB patients detailing HI as a risk factor for the investigated outcomes were selected. For the overall results, pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on a random-effects model. Subgroups were formed based on the source of bleeding. The Quality of Prognostic Studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results: A total of 62 studies were eligible, and 39 were included in the quantitative synthesis. HI was found to be a risk factor for both in-hospital (OR: 5.48; CI: 3.99–7.52) and 30-day mortality (OR: 3.99; CI: 3.08–5.17) in upper GIB (UGIB). HI was also associated with higher in-hospital (OR: 3.68; CI: 2.24–6.05) and 30-day rebleeding rates (OR: 4.12; 1.83–9.31) among patients with UGIB. The need for surgery was also more frequent in hemodynamically compromised UGIB patients (OR: 3.65; CI: 2.84–4.68). In the case of in-hospital mortality, the risk of bias was high for 1 (4%), medium for 13 (48%), and low for 13 (48%) of the 27 included studies. Conclusion: Hemodynamically compromised patients have increased odds of all relevant untoward end points in GIB. Therefore, to improve the outcomes, adequate emergency care is crucial in HI. Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021285727.
“…The rate of HI/shock ranged between 1.2% and 68.3% of the eligible studies. The source of bleeding was UGIB in 54 of the included studies, [8][9][10][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34]36,37,[39][40][41][42][43][44][45][47][48][49][50][52][53][54][55][58][59][60][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72][73][74]…”
Section: Basic Characteristics Of Included Studiesmentioning
Background: Acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a life-threatening event. Around 20–30% of patients with GIB will develop hemodynamic instability (HI). Objectives: We aimed to quantify HI as a risk factor for the development of relevant end points in acute GIB. Design: A systematic search was conducted in three medical databases in October 2021. Data sources and methods: Studies of GIB patients detailing HI as a risk factor for the investigated outcomes were selected. For the overall results, pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated based on a random-effects model. Subgroups were formed based on the source of bleeding. The Quality of Prognostic Studies tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Results: A total of 62 studies were eligible, and 39 were included in the quantitative synthesis. HI was found to be a risk factor for both in-hospital (OR: 5.48; CI: 3.99–7.52) and 30-day mortality (OR: 3.99; CI: 3.08–5.17) in upper GIB (UGIB). HI was also associated with higher in-hospital (OR: 3.68; CI: 2.24–6.05) and 30-day rebleeding rates (OR: 4.12; 1.83–9.31) among patients with UGIB. The need for surgery was also more frequent in hemodynamically compromised UGIB patients (OR: 3.65; CI: 2.84–4.68). In the case of in-hospital mortality, the risk of bias was high for 1 (4%), medium for 13 (48%), and low for 13 (48%) of the 27 included studies. Conclusion: Hemodynamically compromised patients have increased odds of all relevant untoward end points in GIB. Therefore, to improve the outcomes, adequate emergency care is crucial in HI. Registration: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021285727.
“…Through literature review of previous studies, we found three clinical predictive models that are similar to the UGIB‐LC score, including CAGIB score, MELDNa‐AGIB model, and the Bedside risk‐scoring model 33–35 . The variables of the CAGIB score include diabetes mellitus (DM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), TBIL, ALB, ALT, and SCr.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Child-Pugh score, MELD score, and NLR as control methods to evaluate the UGIB-LC score in predicting the 6-week mortality of liver cirrhosis patients with acute UGIB, and revealed that the UGIB-LC score was superior to these scoring systems in predicting the 6-week mortality risk in such patients. Through literature review of previous studies, we found three clinical predictive models that are similar to the UGIB-LC score, including CAGIB score, MELDNa-AGIB model, and the Bedside risk-scoring model [33][34][35]. The variables of the CAGIB score include diabetes mellitus (DM), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), TBIL, ALB, ALT, and SCr.Zhao et al suggested that the CAGIB score was superior to Child-Pugh and MELD scores in predicting mortality in a F I G U R E 5 Calibration curve plot in the A, internal validation and B, external validation sets, showing good agreement between prediction and observation F I G U R E 6 The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of upper gastrointestinal bleeding-liver cirrhosis (UGIB-LC) score, Child-Pugh score, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in A, the training cohort and B, the validation cohort cohort of patients with HCC.…”
Objective
To develop and validate a nomogram for predicting 6‐week mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis and acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and to compare it with other commonly used scoring systems.
Methods
This retrospective study included cirrhotic patients with acute UGIB hospitalized between January 2013 and December 2020. Random sampling was used to divide patients into the training (n = 676) and validation cohorts (n = 291) at a 7:3 ratio. Multivariate logistic stepwise regression was used to establish a model for predicting 6‐week mortality. Multiple indicators were used to validate the nomogram, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results
In the training cohort, total bilirubin (TBIL) (odds ratio [OR] 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22–2.50), hemoglobin (Hb) (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95–0.99), C‐reactive protein (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.30–6.07), prothrombin time (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.05–1.30), and hepatic encephalopathy (stage I–II: OR 4.15, 95% CI 1.73–9.61; stage III–IV: OR 19.6, 95% CI 5.33–76.8) were identified as independent factors of 6‐week mortality. The AUROC of the UGIB‐LC score was 0.873 (95% CI 0.820–0.927), which was higher than that of the Child–Pugh score (0.781), model for end‐stage liver disease score (0.766), and neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (0.716).
Conclusion
The UGIB‐LC score is useful for predicting 6‐week mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis and acute UGIB, which is superior to the other three scoring systems.
“…We read with interest the paper "Bedside risk-scoring model for predicting 6-week mortality in cirrhotic patients undergoing endoscopic band ligation for acute variceal bleeding" published in the May issue of Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 1 The authors used Cox regression analysis to assess the relationship between clinical, biological, and endoscopic variables and 6-week mortality risk after EBL in a derivation cohort (n = 1373). The primary outcome was the predictive accuracy of the new model for the 6-week mortality in the validation cohort.…”
Section: The Complexities Of Predicting Outcome In Cirrhotic Patients With Acute Variceal Bleedingmentioning
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.