Bedside Shift Reports

Gregory, Sean; Tan, Debra; Tilrico, Michael; Edwardson, Nicholas; Gamm, Larry

doi:10.1097/nna.0000000000000115

Cited by 61 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Another potential explanation is that nurses do not trust the information in the EHR. Indeed a prior study suggested that nurses preferentially depend on either bedside information or verbal communication (Collins, Bakken, Vawdrey, Coiera, & Currie, 2011b;Gregory, Tan, Tilrico, Edwardson, & Gamm, 2014). This is also supported by another study that demonstrated nursing students are more likely to report incorrect vital signs that were conveyed to them at the bedside by medical students.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Professional and interprofessional differences in electronic health records use and recognition of safety issues in critically ill patients

Sakata

Stephenson

Mulanax

et al. 2016

Journal of Interprofessional Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During interprofessional intensive care unit (ICU) rounds each member of the interprofessional team is responsible for gathering and interpreting information from the electronic health records (EHR) to facilitate effective team decision-making. This study was conducted to determine how each professional group reviews EHR data in preparation for rounds and their ability to identify patient safety issues. Twenty-five physicians, 29 nurses, and 20 pharmacists participated. Individual participants were given verbal and written sign-out and then asked to review a simulated record in our institution's EHR, which contained 14 patient safety items. After reviewing the chart, subjects presented the patient and the number of safety items recognised was recorded. About 40%, 30%, and 26% of safety issues were recognised by physicians, nurses, and pharmacists, respectively (p = 0.0006) and no item recognised 100% of the time. There was little overlap between the three groups with only 50% of items predicted to be recognised 100% of the time by the team. Differential recognition was associated with marked differences in EHR use, with only 3/152 EHR screens utilised by all three groups and the majority of screens used exclusively only by one group. There were significant and non-overlapping differences in individual profession recognition of patient safety issues in the EHR. Preferential identification of safety issues by certain professional groups may be attributed to differences in EHR use. Future studies will be needed to determine if shared decision-making during rounds can improve recognition of safety issues.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 77%

Professional and interprofessional differences in electronic health records use and recognition of safety issues in critically ill patients

Sakata

Stephenson

Mulanax

et al. 2016

Journal of Interprofessional Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The bedside handover, where the nurse-to-nurse handover is performed at the patient's bedside (Anderson & Mangino, 2006), is an upcoming method in nursing due to the many advantages attributed to it (Gregory, Tan, Tilrico, Edwardson, & Gamm, 2014). Still, the body of knowledge on this topic is limited because of the lack of longitudinal, multicentred studies (Smeulers, Lucas, & Vermeulen, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The assumption about the positive effects of bedside handover is grounded in the consequences of performing the nursing handover at the patient's bedside (Gregory et al, 2014). First, due to the patient's presence the information transfer between nurses is improved as irrelevant information is avoided and information given is more accurate.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Patients are also more able to indicate their preferences and expectations about care (McMurray et al, 2011). Theoretically, this process increases the likelihood of patient involvement in the decision-making process on his/her health, of more patient-centered care and of enhanced individualization of the provided care (Gregory et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These findings and assumptions are based on the results of several systematic reviews that collected the results of small-scale, short-term studies (Anderson, Malone, Shanahan, & Manning, 2015;Gregory et al, 2014;Mardis et al, 2016). Looking at the results of these reviews, the acclaimed and mostly positive effects of bedside handovers seem almost limitless.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The effectiveness of bedside handovers: A multilevel, longitudinal study of effects on nurses and patients

Malfait

Eeckloo

Biesen

et al. 2019

Journal of Advanced Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims To investigate the effectiveness of bedside handovers. For nurses, effects on nurse–patient communication, individualized care, coordination of the care process, job satisfaction, intention to leave, patient participation and work interruptions were measured. For patients, effects on patient activation, individualized care and quality of care were measured. Design This is a longitudinal, controlled, multicentred study on 13 nursing wards in five hospitals. The seven interventional wards consisted of two medical rehabilitation, two geriatric and three surgical/medical wards. Methods A questionnaire for patients and nurses at baseline (May–June 2016), 3 (July–August 2017) and 9 months (December 2017–January 2018) after implementation was completed by 799 patients and 165 nurses. Per protocol analysis was used in combination with linear mixed models analysis. Results With exception for work interruptions and patient participation for nurses, no overall effects could be found for both patients and nurses. For nurses, patient participation increased, and work interruptions decreased in the intervention group. Individualized care remained stable in the intervention group, whereas it decreased in the control group. Conclusion The results indicate that bedside handover can be regarded as superior to more commonly used handover models as it enhances patient participation and decreases work interruptions. However, the positive image of bedside handovers, mostly based on observational, short‐term and single‐centred experiences, cannot be confirmed as there were no effects on any of the other measured parameters. As bedside handovers put patient participation on the agenda and negative effects are absent, implementing bedside handovers should be considered a mean for more patient‐centeredness instead of a goal itself.

show abstract

A qualitative analysis of patients' experience with hospitalist service handovers

Wray

Farnan

Arora

et al. 2016

Journal of Hospital Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Bedside Shift Reports

Cited by 61 publications

References 28 publications

Professional and interprofessional differences in electronic health records use and recognition of safety issues in critically ill patients

Professional and interprofessional differences in electronic health records use and recognition of safety issues in critically ill patients

The effectiveness of bedside handovers: A multilevel, longitudinal study of effects on nurses and patients

A qualitative analysis of patients' experience with hospitalist service handovers

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About