Beförderungskriterien innerhalb der senatorischen Laufbahn, dargestellt an der Zeit von 69 bis 138 n. Chr.

Eck, Werner; Temporini, Hildegard; Haase, Wolfgang

doi:10.1515/9783110833133-007

Cited by 49 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Diese Daten und die darauf aufbauenden Analysen von Verbindungen und Verhaltensmustern können entsprechend für alle attraktiven und »modisch« neu erscheinenden Fragen genutzt wer- 17 Millar 1977, 290-313;Birley ²1988, 81-128. 18 Alföldy 1977 zu der im Sinne der Karrieresicherheit vorbildlichen Regelhaftigkeit unter Antoninus Pius; weitergehend die Analyse von Eck 1974. den. Gerade die sachliche Präsentation dieser oftmals spröden, manchmal sogar sperrigen, lexikalischen Texte macht sie so wertvoll und vielfältig nutzbar.…”

Section: Marietta Horsterunclassified

Perspektiven prosopographischer Arbeit

Horster¹

2017

Prosopographie Des Römischen Kaiserreichs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Marietta Horsterunclassified

Perspektiven prosopographischer Arbeit

Horster¹

2017

Prosopographie Des Römischen Kaiserreichs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“… 112 Demougin 1988: 225–43 carefully examines the prosopography and function of seuiri. On the place of this honour in the senatorial cursus, see further Eck 1974: 161–3; Demougin 1982: 89–90; Duncan-Jones 2016: 24–5.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Heredity of Senatorial Status in the Principate

Weisweiler

2020

J. Rom. Stud.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since Mommsen, it has been a tenet of Roman history that Augustus transformed the ‘senatorial order’ into a hereditary class, which encompassed senators, their children, grandchildren and great-grandchildren in the male line. This paper shows that the idea of a hereditary ordo senatorius is a myth without foundation in the evidence. Augustus and his successors conferred new rights and duties upon relatives of senators, but did not change their formal rank. Moreover, the new regulations applied not to three generations of descendants, but only to persons who stood under a senator's patria potestas during his lifetime. Emperors protected the honour and property of these filii familias of senators, in order to incentivise them to participate in politics and invest their wealth into munificence. The Supplementary Material available online gives all known early imperial holders of the title clarissimus vir in the province of Africa (Supplementary Appendix 1), all known early imperial clarissimi iuuenes (Supplementary Appendix 2) and all known early imperial clarissimi pueri (Supplementary Appendix 3).

show abstract

“…14 CIL XIII 6806= Birley 1981, s. 132 = Dietz 1989s(ul)], -leg. / Aug(usti) pro pr(aetore) provinc(iarum) / Thrac(iae) Moes(iae) sup(erioris) Raet(iae) / Germ(aniae) sup(perioris) et / Britt(anniae) / et Modestina eius / et Caerellii Mar/cianus et Germa/nilla filii ; jest to inskrypcja wotywna, imiona bóstwa i namiestnika nie zachowały się; nomen gentile [Caerellius] rekonstruuje się na podstawie imion dzieci; czas powstania inskrypcji przyjmuje się na okres między rokiem 167/168 (wtedy poświadczony jest ostatni prokuratorski zarządca Recji) a 212/213 (definitywny podział prowincji Britannia na Górną i Dolną), "da sonst auf der Inschrift auch für diese Provinz, wie für Obergermanien und Obermösien, der dinstinktive Zusatz nicht fehlen würde"(Dietz 1989, s. 411).15 O pretorskim etapie kariery senatorskiej zob Eck 1975,. s. 181-206.…”

unclassified

Status prawny prowincji mezyjskich w okresie wojen markomańskich

Mrozewicz

2020

10.14746/seg

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In 1962, Anthony R. Birley advanced a remarkable thesis, claiming that the rank of the Roman province of Upper Moesia (Moesia superior) was temporarily reduced from consular to praetorian. To support the assertion, he cited the fact that one of the two legions stationed in the province left it for a period of time; this automatically entailed a revision of its status, which was thus downgraded. A province with one legion was governed by a former praetor, whereas a province with two or more legions was administered by a former consul (vir consularis). A.R. Birley drew on the account in SHA vita Marci 22.9, which states that Marcus Aurelius changed – pro belli necessitate – the status of several provinces, as well as on two inscriptions (CIL III 1566; XIII6806), which contained an unorthodox record of senatorial careers. Both inscriptions mention Upper Moesia. A.R. Birley’s proposition was widely accepted by researchers, though critical views were also expressed. Nonetheless, its impact was so effective that it was subsequently argued that the mechanism should be presumed to have applied to Lower Moesia (Moesia inferior) as well. Still, a thorough analysis of all available sources permits one to conclude that the view is erroneous and altogether unfounded. In fact, its represents an outcome of a puristic application of the prosopographic method, which in this case proved a fundamental mistake.

show abstract

Beförderungskriterien innerhalb der senatorischen Laufbahn, dargestellt an der Zeit von 69 bis 138 n. Chr.

Cited by 49 publications

References 0 publications

Perspektiven prosopographischer Arbeit

Perspektiven prosopographischer Arbeit

The Heredity of Senatorial Status in the Principate

Status prawny prowincji mezyjskich w okresie wojen markomańskich

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About