Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law

Bench‐Capon, Trevor

doi:10.3233/aac-190477

Cited by 11 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 101 publications

(179 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…That was in part due to the fact that the arguments' conclusions in that scenario were contradicting, which could suggest an attack in either direction. As Bench-Capon [15] noted, knowing the type of attack can be crucial. 10 In this experiment, we aimed to test the hypothesis that the preference of the value promoted by an attacked argument may have the effect of avoiding defeat, but the attacking argument is not acceptable together with the attacked argument since the conflict persists (H3).…”

Section: Experiments #3mentioning

confidence: 99%

Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength

Bodanza

Freidin

2023

AAC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We reported a series of experiments carried out to confront the underlying intuitions of value-based argumentation frameworks (VAFs) with the intuitions of ordinary people. Our goal was twofold. On the one hand, we intended to test VAF as a descriptive theory of human argument evaluations. On the other, we aimed to gain new insights from empirical data that could serve to improve VAF as a normative model. The experiments showed that people’s acceptance of arguments deviates from VAF’s semantics and is rather correlated with the importance given to the promoted values, independently of the perceptions of argument interactions through attacks and defeats. Furthermore, arguments were often perceived as promoting more than one value with different relative strengths. Individuals’ analyses of scenarios were also affected by external factors such as biases and arguments not explicit in the framework. Finally, we confirmed that objective acceptance, that is, the acceptance of arguments under any order of the values, was not a frequent behavior. Instead, participants tended to accept only the arguments that promoted the values they subscribe.

show abstract

Section: Experiments #3mentioning

confidence: 99%

Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength

Bodanza

Freidin

2023

AAC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…And then there are some problems to be solved in the effectiveness of administrative law enforcement. Understanding the traditional concept of administrative law enforcement can help us to understand the administrative law enforcement and related problems in the intelligent era, and put forward legal countermeasures [7][8][9].…”

Section: Administrative Law Enforcementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Changes and Challenges of National Rule of Law in the Era of Big Data

2022

IJBDIT

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The era of Big data has come quietly, Big data is constantly affecting all aspects of social life. At the same time, on the one hand, with the rapid development of social economy, the complexity of social relations and contradictions, the rapid increase in the number of cases and the overweight of judicial personnel; on the other hand, with the deepening of the construction of a country ruled by law, the legal quality of the general public has been greatly improved, and they have more expectations for Big datarness and justice. In this paper, through the elaboration of the relevant concepts, and the question Big datare survey on the application of Big data in the rule of law, the application support rate is 60%, 21% of the people are worried about the application of Big data.

show abstract

“…Этот подход предполагает уровневое представление аргументации и отход от немонотонной логики, а объектно ориентируется на исследование юридического диалога, в том числе в ситуации неправоты всех сторон. Такая парадигма (в юридическом смысле -процессуальная или доказательственная) получила широкое распространение и считается актуальной до сих пор [3,9,11,97,98]. Кроме того, в настоящее время предпринимаются попытки создания более технологичных систем, построенных на использовании новейших компьютерных достижений в области искусственного интеллекта.…”

Section: абстрактные правовые аргументы шаблоны «классной доски» и сunclassified

Application of Computer Techniques and Systems in the Study of Law, Intellectual Analysis and Modeling of Legal Activity: A Systematic Review

Trofimov¹,

Metsker²

2020

Proceedings of ISP RAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Integration of computing systems and methods in legal activity allows to extract benefits such as resource saving, increase objectivity, completeness and accuracy of intellectual results. Understanding of the main scientific achievements and trends at the intersection of computer and legal sciences focuses on promising scientific and technological areas of informatization of law. This review systematizes the most important achievements at the intersection of legal and computer sciences, covering foreign and domestic scientific publications for 1949-2020. Researches of computer methods and systems initiated by American jurimetrics were aimed at storing, indexing, abstracting and searching for legal texts and led to the creation of legal information retrieval systems. Domestic legal cybernetics became a pioneer in the field of automation of criminalistics expert examination. Computer modeling of legal reasoning developed on the techniques of artificial intelligence, later it shifted to the field of legal dialogue and conflict of legal arguments, but in recent years it transforms the acquired experience on the basis of modern computer models, patterns and architectures. The popularization of decision-making support systems has provided multi-tasking systems, including information retrieval, legal reasoning, analytics, predictions and control. The latest research segments are focused on the application of machine learning and big data processing. Almost all successful methodological solutions retain their significance, continuing to be applied directly or as the basis for the further development of computational methods and information systems in legal activity.

show abstract

Before and after Dung: Argumentation in AI and Law

Cited by 11 publications

References 101 publications

Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength

Confronting value-based argumentation frameworks with people’s assessment of argument strength

Changes and Challenges of National Rule of Law in the Era of Big Data

Application of Computer Techniques and Systems in the Study of Law, Intellectual Analysis and Modeling of Legal Activity: A Systematic Review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About