Behavior Change Techniques Implemented in Electronic Lifestyle Activity Monitors: A Systematic Content Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundElectronic activity monitors (such as those manufactured by Fitbit, Jawbone, and Nike) improve on standard pedometers by providing automated feedback and interactive behavior change tools via mobile device or personal computer. These monitors are commercially popular and show promise for use in public health interventions. However, little is known about the content of their feedback applications and how individual monitors may differ from one another.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to describe the behavior change techniques implemented in commercially available electronic activity monitors.MethodsElectronic activity monitors (N=13) were systematically identified and tested by 3 trained coders for at least 1 week each. All monitors measured lifestyle physical activity and provided feedback via an app (computer or mobile). Coding was based on a hierarchical list of 93 behavior change techniques. Further coding of potentially effective techniques and adherence to theory-based recommendations were based on findings from meta-analyses and meta-regressions in the research literature.ResultsAll monitors provided tools for self-monitoring, feedback, and environmental change by definition. The next most prevalent techniques (13 out of 13 monitors) were goal-setting and emphasizing discrepancy between current and goal behavior. Review of behavioral goals, social support, social comparison, prompts/cues, rewards, and a focus on past success were found in more than half of the systems. The monitors included a range of 5-10 of 14 total techniques identified from the research literature as potentially effective. Most of the monitors included goal-setting, self-monitoring, and feedback content that closely matched recommendations from social cognitive theory.ConclusionsElectronic activity monitors contain a wide range of behavior change techniques typically used in clinical behavioral interventions. Thus, the monitors may represent a medium by which these interventions could be translated for widespread use. This technology has broad applications for use in clinical, public health, and rehabilitation settings.

Gamifying Accelerometer Use Increases Physical Activity Levels of Sedentary Office Workers

“…There is evidence that just wearing activity monitors has been associated with significant increases in daily steps 9. However, recent research suggests that both activity monitors and apps are typically designed based on behavior change techniques (ie, self‐monitoring, goal setting, feedback) that are limited in their ability to engage users and promote sustained increases in physical activity 10. The development of mobile‐based programs designed to encourage more walking is a worthwhile pursuit given the demonstrated cardioprotective benefits of regular walking 11.…”

The Use of Wearable Activity Trackers Among Older Adults: Focus Group Study of Tracker Perceptions, Motivators, and Barriers in the Maintenance Stage of Behavior Change (Preprint)

“…The present study extends previous research that focused on the analysis of behavioral change techniques embedded in WATs [13,20], by exploring how older adults perceive and experience these techniques. For example, participants in our study saw the benefits of physical activity awareness via self-monitoring and goal-setting.…”

“…In contrast to antecedent technologies, such as pedometers, WATs have the advantage of boosting physical activity through the integration of empirically tested behavioral change techniques such as goal setting, self-monitoring, social support, social comparison, feedback, and rewards [13,20]. Self-monitoring and goal-setting have been especially effective in promoting self-efficacy and physical activity in interventions [21].…”

Evaluation of an Integrated Telemonitoring Surveillance System in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

“…Home-monitoring of physiological parameters and individual goal-setting have been successfully used to support patient self-management [10]. For example, electronic activity monitors in pedometers use goal-setting and display the discrepancy between defined goals and actual behaviour [11]. A combination of regular clinical follow-ups, complemented by selfmonitoring with goal-setting, may substantially support self-management in CHD patients [10,12].…”