“…Despite the convincing evidence of their poor overall so cial functioning, there exist surprisingly few data on the precise nature or the basis of their difficulties [2], In one of our former studies a complex pattern of social and situational vari ables (i.e. unremunerative occupation, un married state, lack of social contacts, higher age, pessimistic expectations but relative sat isfaction with the present situation) appeared to be much more characteristic of such pa tients than any diagnostic or psychopathologi cal variable [3], Similar psychosocial deficits in adapting to life in the community have also been described in subsequent reviews by Matson [4], Anthony and Jansen [5] or Wing [6], Traditional explanatory models, based on core psychological deficits [7], vulnerabilitystress models [8,9] or the distinction between negative and positive symptoms [10,11] may not be sufficient to understand the phenome non of chronicity. More recently, the hypoth esis has been formulated that certain behav iors usually related to chronicity, such as emo tional withdrawal and reduction of initiative and interpersonal social involvement, could be understood as secondary coping strategies [12,13], The suggestion of Rothbaum, et al [14], that such a passive and withdrawn be havior may afford patients a certain sense of control (secondary control), might open ways for more convincing explanations of the spe cific behavior of these patients.…”