2010
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/12/3/033036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of a porous particle in a radiofrequency plasma under pulsed argon ion beam bombardment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the potential measured above a silica dust covered surface showed ~14 V more negative than that above a smooth, solid silica surface in an identical plasma condition. The reduced SE emission yield for the dusty surface is therefore not due to different surface materials in the above experiments, rather should be mainly attributed to the re‐absorption of the emitted SEs by neighboring dust particles or structures [ Wang et al ., ; Martin and von Engel , ; Wiese et al ., ; Richterová et al ., ; Ma et al ., ]. This mechanism supports our patched charge model and should be also true for photoelectrons emitted from dusty surfaces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similarly, the potential measured above a silica dust covered surface showed ~14 V more negative than that above a smooth, solid silica surface in an identical plasma condition. The reduced SE emission yield for the dusty surface is therefore not due to different surface materials in the above experiments, rather should be mainly attributed to the re‐absorption of the emitted SEs by neighboring dust particles or structures [ Wang et al ., ; Martin and von Engel , ; Wiese et al ., ; Richterová et al ., ; Ma et al ., ]. This mechanism supports our patched charge model and should be also true for photoelectrons emitted from dusty surfaces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Overall, the surface potential of aggregates shows greater fluctuation and is generally greater than that of a sphere with the same mass, due to the greater surface area of the aggregate. A similar effect has been seen in an experimental study (Wiese et al 2010). Aggregates consisting of monomers with a = 5 nm and 10 nm have a surface potential which is significantly higher than that for a sphere with the same mass.…”
Section: Model For Estimating Aggregate Chargesupporting
confidence: 84%
“…The charging of aggregate dust grains has been studied recently both in laboratory and astrophysical environments (Wiese et al 2010;Ilgner 2012;Okuzumi et al 2011); these results have shown that aggregates tend to acquire more charge when compared to spherical grains of the same mass due to the porous/fluffy structure of the aggregate, and that charged aggregates have a significant effect on subsequent dust evolution. However, there has not been a detailed study of characterizing the charge on aggregates based on structural characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been shown that aggregates in both laboratory and astrophysical environments tend to acquire more charge compared to spherical grains of the same mass due to their porous structure [20][21][22][23]. A fluffy aggregate, consisting of many spherical monomers, has charge distributed over its irregular surface which leads to a nonzero dipole moment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%