2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.094
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of E-glass composite laminates under ballistic impact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is uncertain whether the 22% increase in the penetration energy is due to the presence of the MWNT/epoxy nanofibres and particles or the increased thickness (by 15%) of the glass fibre fabric-electrospun MWNT/Araldite-epoxy laminate against the plain glass fibre fabric-epoxy laminate. Rama Subba Reddy et al [37] reported the relation between the penetration energy, Ep (in J), and the laminate thickness, H (in mm): Ep = 10.83 H 1.457 for a glass fibre-phenolic laminate, which would lead to a similar increase of absorbed energy as in this study. However, a 15% laminate thickness increase for 22% greater penetration energy would also mean a 15% increase in the mass of the glass fibre-epoxy laminate, whereas in the present study the MWNT interlayers of the glass fibre fabric-electrospun MWNT/Araldite-epoxy laminate brought only a 3.7% mass increase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…It is uncertain whether the 22% increase in the penetration energy is due to the presence of the MWNT/epoxy nanofibres and particles or the increased thickness (by 15%) of the glass fibre fabric-electrospun MWNT/Araldite-epoxy laminate against the plain glass fibre fabric-epoxy laminate. Rama Subba Reddy et al [37] reported the relation between the penetration energy, Ep (in J), and the laminate thickness, H (in mm): Ep = 10.83 H 1.457 for a glass fibre-phenolic laminate, which would lead to a similar increase of absorbed energy as in this study. However, a 15% laminate thickness increase for 22% greater penetration energy would also mean a 15% increase in the mass of the glass fibre-epoxy laminate, whereas in the present study the MWNT interlayers of the glass fibre fabric-electrospun MWNT/Araldite-epoxy laminate brought only a 3.7% mass increase.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Both of laminate and patch are meshed with the reducedintegration linear 8-node brick elements (C3D8R). According to previous studies, the deformation of projectile can be negligible under the case of thinner laminate and lower ballistic velocity (Reddy et al, 2015). Hence, the steel projectile is modeled as a rigid body and meshed with the discrete rigid element (R3D4).…”
Section: Finite Element Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual velocities of the projectile and ballistic limits of the targets have been predicted from the simulations. The results have been compared with various analytical models and with the results of experiments reported elsewhere (Reddy et al, 2015). The damage mechanisms mainly two stage damage mechanism, delamination and matrix cracking etc., and wave propagation phenomena in the target material have been studied and compared with the results of experiments and analytical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%