2nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting 1965
DOI: 10.2514/6.1965-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of fully stressed design of structures and its relationshipto minimum-weight design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using full stress method [26], the finite element models were optimized by adjusting stress ratio of members to make sure that steel consumption in the five investigated structural forms is the same. The impact of steel consumption on structural stability is eliminated and the initial stability of the structural forms can be ensured.. For instance, the overall stability of the structure can be mildly improved when stress ratio of top members is lower than that of other members.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using full stress method [26], the finite element models were optimized by adjusting stress ratio of members to make sure that steel consumption in the five investigated structural forms is the same. The impact of steel consumption on structural stability is eliminated and the initial stability of the structural forms can be ensured.. For instance, the overall stability of the structure can be mildly improved when stress ratio of top members is lower than that of other members.…”
Section: Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stiffness Distribution for Fully-stressed Designs. Motivated by the idea of optimal material distribution for full utilization (i.e., members stress demand to capacity ratio of 1.0) under design loads [43,39], we define a fully-stressed design in the context of failure in shear frames as a stable arrangement of structural members such that the resulting frame fails simultaneously at all stories under the application of design loads. For a shear frame loaded laterally as in Fig.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimization is adopted as a selection of testing parameters in monitoring of bridges (see references [7][8][9][10][11]). The selection of testing parameters is subjected to following constraints:  Geometric constraints-minimum and maximum areas, dimensions and rigidities of thin-walled members adopted,  Stress constraints-maximum allowable stress,  Displacement constraints-minimum and maximum deformations, rotations and displacements,  Resonance, stability and fatigue ultimate limits.…”
Section: Structural Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%