2001
DOI: 10.1002/1522-2624(200102)164:1<65::aid-jpln65>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) in soils and water of reservoir Radeburg II catchment (Saxony/Germany)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
38
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…T 1/2 decreased as follows across the three soils: Toulouse > Dijon > Châlons (Table 4). These values are consistent with those reported by Rueppel et al ,18 but are generally very small compared with those reported elsewhere in the literature23–25 because of optimum conditions of soil temperature and moisture in our study. Glyphosate was more persistent in the Toulouse soil where adsorption was highest, and less persistent in Châlons soil where adsorption was weakest (Table 5).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…T 1/2 decreased as follows across the three soils: Toulouse > Dijon > Châlons (Table 4). These values are consistent with those reported by Rueppel et al ,18 but are generally very small compared with those reported elsewhere in the literature23–25 because of optimum conditions of soil temperature and moisture in our study. Glyphosate was more persistent in the Toulouse soil where adsorption was highest, and less persistent in Châlons soil where adsorption was weakest (Table 5).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Glyphosate's degradation can occur rapidly in the soil, with values of DT50 between 3 to 40 days (e.g. Rueppel et al, 1977;Smith and Aubin, 1993;Grunewald et al, 2001;Simonsen et al, 2008;Zablotowicz et al, 2009;Bergstrӧm et al, 2011). Since the recovery of TEG was not 100%, some of the glyphosate could have degraded into sarcosine or completely dissipated by microbial activity during the transport process.…”
Section: Glyphosate Retention In Soil Columnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To estimate the relative contributions of spray drift and wind erosion to glyphosate and AMPA in the air, a simple mass balance model is suggested. The model makes six assumptions: the control volume is a 2,000-m column of well-mixed air with a base of 1 m  1 m; the only two sources of glyphosate to the air are spray drift and wind erosion; wind erosion is the only source for AMPA; the transformation (biodegradation) of glyphosate to AMPA occurs only in the soil [36]; no or negligible photo-oxidation of glyphosate or AMPA occurred; and the ratio of glyphosate concentration in soil to AMPA concentration in soil (S) decreases weekly from 5.1 (first week after application) to 0.1 (twelfth week after application). This is based on the logarithmic fitting of field observations reported by Grunewald et al [36], and wind erosion produces air particles with the same glyphosate to AMPA ratio as found in the soil.…”
Section: Timing Of Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%