1997
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1997.68-117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of Rats Under Fixed Consecutive Number Schedules: Effects of Drugs of Abuse

Abstract: Four rats responded under a simple fixed consecutive number schedule in which eight or more consecutive responses on the run lever, followed by a single response on the reinforcement lever, produced the food reinforcer. Under this simple schedule, dose-response curves were determined for diazepam, morphine, pentobarbital, and phencyclidine. The rats were then trained to respond under a multiple fixed consecutive number schedule in which a discriminative stimulus signaled when the response requirement on the ru… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Picker et al (1987) examined the effects of opiate agonists and antagonists on FCN responding in rats and obtained reductions in accuracy with most, but not all, of these compounds. Recently, Snodgrass et al (1997) reported the effects of diazepam, pentobarbital, PCP and morphine on FCN 8 schedules, and concluded that "responding under the FCN schedule is not very useful in differentiating amongst drugs. Each of the drugs disrupted stimulus control and they all decreased the rate of responding..." (Snodgrass et al 1997, p. 130).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Picker et al (1987) examined the effects of opiate agonists and antagonists on FCN responding in rats and obtained reductions in accuracy with most, but not all, of these compounds. Recently, Snodgrass et al (1997) reported the effects of diazepam, pentobarbital, PCP and morphine on FCN 8 schedules, and concluded that "responding under the FCN schedule is not very useful in differentiating amongst drugs. Each of the drugs disrupted stimulus control and they all decreased the rate of responding..." (Snodgrass et al 1997, p. 130).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%