2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.11.060
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavior of two new moment resisting precast beam to column connections subjected to lateral loading

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results satisfied all criteria of ACI T1.1-01 [15]. Bahrami et al [16] studied two new moment resisting precast connection, numerically. In this connection precast beam was connected to the precast column with corbel by use of (i) inverted Ebolted connection and (ii) by box section-welded connection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The results satisfied all criteria of ACI T1.1-01 [15]. Bahrami et al [16] studied two new moment resisting precast connection, numerically. In this connection precast beam was connected to the precast column with corbel by use of (i) inverted Ebolted connection and (ii) by box section-welded connection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…• Insufficient total embedded length but sufficient elastic embedded length, In this case, the first two developing stages of the slip are the same as Eqs. (18) and (20) in case (1) since the elastic embedded length is sufficient. However, when the bar stress at the loaded end is over the yield strength (hardening), the bar can be stressed through the start point (continuous bars) or the free-end (anchored bars), consequently the elastic and plastic developed bond lengths will be…”
Section: Analytical Derivation Of the Bar Slipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hawileh et al [10] developed a detailed 3D finite element model for precast hybrid beam-to-column connections subjected to cyclic loads, and surface-to-surface contact between the beam and column faces were considered in the model. Bahrami et al [18] numerically analyzed seismic performance of two new precast beam-to-column connections using ABAQUS software, covering the lateral resistance, ductility and energy dissipation of the connections. However, the analysis was also limited to monotonic loading.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past three to four decades, most studies on precast RC structures were focused on their seismic performance. The conventional way is to conduct cyclic loading tests of the precast beam‐to‐column connections and/or develop high‐fidelity finite element models to assess the seismic performance (e.g., failure mode, cyclic behavior, and energy dissipation) of the corresponding precast structures. Nevertheless, as a new concern, progressive collapse performance of structures has attracted more and more attentions, because the unexpected accidental events, for example, malicious attacks, gas explosion, vehicle impact, and human error, were frequently happening around the world in recent years and caused great loss of human lives and public properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%