2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral adjustments and equity effects of congestion pricing: Analysis of morning commutes during the Stockholm Trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If all income in a country is allocated to only one person its value is 1; if all people have the same income it is 0 (see also below, Fig. 1 Santos et al (2008) used it in the context of accessibility evaluation of road network design, Tian et al (2012) used it to evaluate efficiency and equity effects of ramp control schemes, Karlström and Franklin (2009) used it to evaluate equity effects of the Stockholm congestion pricing trial and Delbosc and Currie (2011) have used it to assess the social exclusion effects of public transport services in Melbourne, Australia. Van Wee (2011) and Van Wee and Geurs (2011) have argued the Gini index is applicable to evaluate accessibility and social exclusion effects.…”
Section: Use Of the Gini Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If all income in a country is allocated to only one person its value is 1; if all people have the same income it is 0 (see also below, Fig. 1 Santos et al (2008) used it in the context of accessibility evaluation of road network design, Tian et al (2012) used it to evaluate efficiency and equity effects of ramp control schemes, Karlström and Franklin (2009) used it to evaluate equity effects of the Stockholm congestion pricing trial and Delbosc and Currie (2011) have used it to assess the social exclusion effects of public transport services in Melbourne, Australia. Van Wee (2011) and Van Wee and Geurs (2011) have argued the Gini index is applicable to evaluate accessibility and social exclusion effects.…”
Section: Use Of the Gini Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge has been in place for more than five years, and measurement of the effects has been extensive (Börjesson et al 2012, Eliasson 2008, Karlström and Franklin 2009and Kristofferson 2013. Studies have shown that traffic over the taxed cordon was reduced significantly after the permanent implementation of the charge (approximately 18.75% over the period [2008][2009][2010][2011].…”
Section: Stockholm's Congestion Chargementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that it is likely that the revenues would be used to some extent to improve the public transport system, the proposed congestion-charging scheme for Stockholm was considered to be progressive rather than regressive. Karlström and Franklin [33] considered specifically two behavioural adjustments: mode choice and departure time choice and assessed the horizontal and vertical equity effects of the Stockholm Trial with Congestion Pricing for morning commuters, in terms of both travel behavioural adjustments and welfare effects. The existing practice has implied significant opportunities for financing new roadway investment while addressing congestion and equity issues, with net gains for both types of travellers.…”
Section: Traffic Congestion Chargingmentioning
confidence: 99%