2016
DOI: 10.1080/87565641.2016.1255744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral and Neural Foundations of Multisensory Face-Voice Perception in Infancy

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is not in agreement with evidence that has emerged in other studies, where it was found that undergraduates tend to remember more complex stimuli (Pallett and MacLeod, 2011). These controversial results depend on the different age of subjects in the studies and on the different stimuli (Huhmann, 2003;Pallett and MacLeod, 2011;Hyde et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is not in agreement with evidence that has emerged in other studies, where it was found that undergraduates tend to remember more complex stimuli (Pallett and MacLeod, 2011). These controversial results depend on the different age of subjects in the studies and on the different stimuli (Huhmann, 2003;Pallett and MacLeod, 2011;Hyde et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 97%
“…According to other research, the complexity of stimuli also affects the memory of these stimuli (Huhmann, 2003;Pallett and MacLeod, 2011;Hyde et al, 2016). Specifically, some studies have found that school-aged children are able to remember more simple stimuli than complex ones (Huhmann, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Reliance on multiple senses and their interaction may here help provide richer spatial and temporal representations of our environment (Keetels & Vroomen, 2012;Stoep, Postma, & Nijboer, 2017). These multisensory strategies are present during infant-caregiver joint attentional engagement, which reflects the multisensory nature of parent-infant dyadic communication (Gogate, Bahrick, & Watson, 2000;Gogate, Bolzani, & Betancourt, 2006;Hyde, Flom, & Porter, 2016). Multimodal behaviors help sustain joint attention between parents and infants from 12 to 16 months old, in particular when parents express some interest in an object looking at, talking about, and touching the jointly attended object (Suarez-Rivera, Smith, & Yu, 2019).…”
Section: Visual Cues Provide Multisensory Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gaze-based joint attention enhances basic object recognition, even in very young infants (Cleveland & Striano, 2007;Hoehl, Wahl, Michel, & Striano, 2012;Wahl, Marinović, & Träuble, 2019). However, object-recognition development relies on the ability to perceive global, invariant, and amodal properties like spatial location, tempo, rhythm, and intensity, which can only be conveyed through the combination of different sense modalities (Bahrick & Lickliter, 2014;Hyde et al, 2016). The redundancy introduced by multisensory events can thus be strategically used to establish joint attention on amodal features of objects and events.…”
Section: Jointly Attending To Amodal Featuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, even young children can understand how something is said by responding to non-verbal cues such as the tone of voice or facial expression (Hyde, Flom, & Porter, 2016).…”
Section: Active Listeningmentioning
confidence: 99%