2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral and neural processes in counterconditioning: Past and future directions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
1
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Running head: EXTINCTION VS. COUNTERCONDITIONING 6 An alternative procedure to reduce fear is counterconditioning, which involves pairing the CS+ with a US of opposite valence (Keller, Hennings, & Dunsmoor, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Running head: EXTINCTION VS. COUNTERCONDITIONING 6 An alternative procedure to reduce fear is counterconditioning, which involves pairing the CS+ with a US of opposite valence (Keller, Hennings, & Dunsmoor, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present findings may also carry clinical significance. For instance, they suggest the possibility of expediting counterconditioning procedures by coupling them with associabilityboosting manipulations (Keller et al, 2020). In behavioral therapy, counterconditioning refers to a collection of procedures that seek to modify maladaptive behaviors by associating their triggering events with an outcome of the opposite affective valence (Keller et al, 2020;Konorski & Szwejkowska, 1956).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, they suggest the possibility of expediting counterconditioning procedures by coupling them with associabilityboosting manipulations (Keller et al, 2020). In behavioral therapy, counterconditioning refers to a collection of procedures that seek to modify maladaptive behaviors by associating their triggering events with an outcome of the opposite affective valence (Keller et al, 2020;Konorski & Szwejkowska, 1956). Recent studies show that counterconditioning therapies have greater efficacy (Engelhard et al, 2014;Kerkhof et al, 2011;Raes & De Raedt, 2012) and resistance to relapse (Kang et al, 2018) than exposure therapies based on extinction procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 13 Multiple neurotransmitters (norepinephrine, serotonin and dopamine) and brain regions (amygdala, hippocampdus an locus ceurelus) are involved in the response to noise triggers. 14 There is a risk for sensitisation (rather than habituation or desensitisation) if the noise trigger evokes a fear response; this is mitigated by appropriate recognition of fear by dog owners, anxiolytic treatment and counterconditioning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%