Behavioral asymmetries in visual short-term memory occur in retinotopic coordinates

Abstract

Visual short-term memory (VSTM) is an essential store that creates continuous representations from disjointed visual input. However, severe capacity limits exist, reflecting constraints in supporting brain networks. VSTM performance shows spatial biases predicted by asymmetries in the brain based upon the location of the remembered object. Visual representations are retinotopic, or relative to location of the representation on the retina. It therefore stands to reason that memory performance may also show retinotopic biases. Here, eye position was manipulated to tease apart retinotopic coordinates from spatiotopic coordinates, or location relative to the external world. Memory performance was measured while participants performed a color change-detection task for items presented across the visual field while subjects fixated central or peripheral position. VSTM biases reflected the location of the stimulus on the retina, regardless of where the stimulus appeared on the screen. Therefore, spatial biases occur in retinotopic coordinates in VSTM and suggest a fundamental link between behavioral VSTM measures and visual representations.

Dynamic saccade context triggers more stable object-location binding

“…Previous studies testing other aspects of visual perception have found mixed evidence for spatiotopic effects. Although some studies have found evidence of spatiotopic effects in visual memory, adaptation, and feature integration (Demeyer et al, 2009(Demeyer et al, , 2010(Demeyer et al, , 2011Ezzati et al, 2008;Fairhall et al, 2017;Fischer & Whitney, 2014;Harrison & Bex, 2014;Hayhoe et al, 1991;Melcher & Morrone, 2003;Mikellidou et al, 2021;Prime et al, 2006;Steinberg et al, 2022;Turi & Burr, 2012;Van Eccelpoel et al, 2008;Wijdenes et al, 2015;Wittenberg et al, 2008;Wolfe & Whitney, 2015;Zimmermann et al, 2013), other studies only observed retinotopic evidence (Afraz & Cavanagh, 2009;Collins, 2019;Golomb et al, 2008;Golomb & Kanwisher, 2012a;Hui et al, 2020;McKyton et al, 2009;Shafer-Skelton et al, 2017;Shafer-Skelton & Golomb, 2018;Sheremata et al, 2023). As such, there has been a lot of debate over the years regarding reference frames for visual cognition across saccades (Cavanagh et al, 2010;Golomb & Mazer, 2021;Lappi, 2016;Marino & Mazer, 2016).…”