2022
DOI: 10.1177/15270025221128955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Biases in Daily Fantasy Baseball: The Case of the Hot Hand

Abstract: Despite mixed evidence, sport participants and fans heavily believe in the existence of the hot hand. Prior literature examining NBA and NFL betting markets found betters were biased towards hot teams. Using a unique market and data set, this study identifies if the hot hand is prevalent in daily fantasy baseball contests, if there is a profitable hot hand selection strategy, and if consumers believe in its existence. Results show that while there is no evidence of a hot hand effect, and no evidence of a profi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pivotal research by Brown and Sauer (35) posited that the mere belief of the hot hand phenomenon could impact the pointspread betting market. Various other studies have shown that bettors tend to favor hot teams (36,37), and this has even been shown to transpire among more recent methods of sports gambling [e.g., in daily fantasy sports when setting lineups; (38)]. That said, further research in this area needs to be explored to better contextualize the specific effects of blowouts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pivotal research by Brown and Sauer (35) posited that the mere belief of the hot hand phenomenon could impact the pointspread betting market. Various other studies have shown that bettors tend to favor hot teams (36,37), and this has even been shown to transpire among more recent methods of sports gambling [e.g., in daily fantasy sports when setting lineups; (38)]. That said, further research in this area needs to be explored to better contextualize the specific effects of blowouts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%