2015
DOI: 10.1257/jep.29.4.37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral CEOs: The Role of Managerial Overconfidence

Abstract: In this paper, we provide a theoretical and empirical framework that allows us to synthesize and assess the burgeoning literature on CEO overconfidence. We also provide novel empirical evidence that overconfidence matters for corporate investment decisions in a framework that explicitly addresses the endogeneity of firms' financing constraints.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
173
2
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
10
173
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, findings of overconfidence in own performance relative to that of others (e.g., Svenson 1981) has motivated many studies by experimental economists on the relationship between relative confidence, relative ability, and willingness to take risks in strategic environments (e.g., Camerer and Lovallo 1999;Hoelzl and Rustichini 2005;Moore and Cain 2007;Niederle and Vesterlund 2007). Confidence about own abilities has been shown to affect many important spheres of economic behaviour including consumer decision making (Grubb 2015), trading in financial markets (Biais et al 2005;Kent and Hirshleifer 2015), innovative activity (Herz et al 2014), investment in education (Dunning et al 2004), and decision making among managers and CEOs (Malmendier and Tate 2015). Given this, it is not surprising that economists have shown interest in developing theoretical models to examine the implications of biases in confidence (e.g., Compte and Postlewaite 2004;Dubra 2004;Gervais et al 2011;Ludwig et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, findings of overconfidence in own performance relative to that of others (e.g., Svenson 1981) has motivated many studies by experimental economists on the relationship between relative confidence, relative ability, and willingness to take risks in strategic environments (e.g., Camerer and Lovallo 1999;Hoelzl and Rustichini 2005;Moore and Cain 2007;Niederle and Vesterlund 2007). Confidence about own abilities has been shown to affect many important spheres of economic behaviour including consumer decision making (Grubb 2015), trading in financial markets (Biais et al 2005;Kent and Hirshleifer 2015), innovative activity (Herz et al 2014), investment in education (Dunning et al 2004), and decision making among managers and CEOs (Malmendier and Tate 2015). Given this, it is not surprising that economists have shown interest in developing theoretical models to examine the implications of biases in confidence (e.g., Compte and Postlewaite 2004;Dubra 2004;Gervais et al 2011;Ludwig et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In his criticism of nudges, Gigerenzer (2015, p. 371) gives a prominent role to overcon…dence, and discounts most of the existing evidence on overcon…dence. Although there are dif…culties in measuring overcon…dence, behavioral economics has documented impressive evidence on overcon…dence, using novel methods, not cited in Gigerenzer (2015); see for instance, the surveys in Malmendier and Taylor (2015), and Malmendier and Tate (2015). This evidence indicates that overcon…dence may harm people's self-interest.…”
Section: The Rationale For Nudgesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to capital investment and mergers and acquisitions, overconfident executives have higher R & D investment levels [3] [9], but it is possible to reduce long-term stock returns and financial performance, indicating that there are also over-investment issues in research and development [13]. But it is not hard to notice that overconfident CEO does not equate with the high level of investment.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, agency X. B. Liu problems and overconfidence can also account for investment-cash flow sensitivity, therefore overinvestment and underinvestment can both be expressed as investment-cash flow sensitivity [13]. Investment cash flow sensitivity method depends entirely on the prior classification of the enterprise in determining the lack of investment and excessive investment, which indicate a great limitation of this method.…”
Section: Measuring Overinvestmentmentioning
confidence: 99%