2004
DOI: 10.1023/b:bege.0000023650.32243.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Characterization of Alcohol-Tolerant and Alcohol-Nontolerant Rat Lines and an F2Generation

Abstract: The Alcohol Tolerant (AT) and Alcohol Nontolerant (ANT) rats, selectively bred for ethanol-induced ataxia on the inclined plane at ALKO in Finland, were moved to the University of Colorado in 1998. The selection phenotype was tested on generation 60 animals in Colorado. In week one, ataxia was measured on the inclined plane 30 minutes after an intraperitoneal dose of 2 g/kg 15% w/v ethanol. Differences in ethanol-induced ataxia between the AT and ANT lines at the University of Colorado were similar to those in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of these is the observation that α6 knock-out animals do not show changes in EtOH sensitivity (Homanics et al, 1997b), and the other is that backcrosses of ANT/AT animals did not show a segregation of the EtOH-sensitive phenotype with the mutant α6 alleles (Korpi et al, 1992;Radcliffe et al, 2004). We think that a possible, maybe even likely, explanation is differences in the EtOH doses at which behavioral assays for alcohol intoxications are performed.…”
Section: A Polymorphism In the Cerebellar Gaba A R α6(α6r100q) Subunimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…One of these is the observation that α6 knock-out animals do not show changes in EtOH sensitivity (Homanics et al, 1997b), and the other is that backcrosses of ANT/AT animals did not show a segregation of the EtOH-sensitive phenotype with the mutant α6 alleles (Korpi et al, 1992;Radcliffe et al, 2004). We think that a possible, maybe even likely, explanation is differences in the EtOH doses at which behavioral assays for alcohol intoxications are performed.…”
Section: A Polymorphism In the Cerebellar Gaba A R α6(α6r100q) Subunimentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For the Sardinian nonpreferring rats, it is a partial segregation 25 , whereas for the alcohol tolerant (AT)/alcohol non-tolerant (ANT) line, almost all of the ANT rats are homozygous for the Gabra6 100Q allele 24 . However, because the α6-R100Q polymorphism had not been shown to affect ethanol sensitivity of recombinant receptors 24 and because backcrosses of ANT/AT rats had led researchers to question the correlation between this polymorphism and the ethanol-hypersensitive phenotype, it has been concluded that genetic differences other than the one causing the α6-R100Q polymorphism were important 27,38 .…”
Section: Gabra6 100q Allele and Behavioral Sensitivity To Ethanolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the Sardinian nonpreferring rats, it is a partial segregation 25 , whereas for the alcohol tolerant (AT)/alcohol non-tolerant (ANT) line, almost all of the ANT rats are homozygous for the Gabra6 100Q allele 24 . However, because the α6-R100Q polymorphism had not been shown to affect ethanol sensitivity of recombinant receptors 24 and because backcrosses of ANT/AT rats had led researchers to question the correlation between this polymorphism and the ethanol-hypersensitive phenotype, it has been concluded that genetic differences other than the one causing the α6-R100Q polymorphism were important 27,38 .It remains to be determined whether the α6 polymorphism accounts for all aspects of the ANT phenotype and whether it contributes to complex behaviors that do not obviously involve the cerebellum (such as alcohol preference in the Sardinian line or anxiety in ANT rats 39 ). In these selectively bred lines, control and experimental groups of rats are typically isolated by more than 40 generations of breeding, a strategy likely to segregate multiple genetic loci.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chronic tolerance and dependence (i.e., withdrawal severity) may be negatively genetically coupled, but the evidence for this is also mixed [Crabbe 1996;Crabbe et al 1988;Crabbe et al 1983;Drews et al 2010); for review, see (Crabbe et al in press)]. Overall, it is likely that the genetic relationships among sensitivity, tolerance and dependence vary somewhat not only with the behaviors and the specific forms of tolerance studied but also with the specific genetic animal models employed (Radcliffe et al 2004;Deitrich et al 2000). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%