1986
DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(86)91037-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral effects of exposure to nuclear magnetic resonance imaging: II. Spatial memory tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of a number of other studies have also reported that exposure to stronger static and time-varying magnetic fields have no apparent effects on a variety of measures of learning and memory in laboratory rodents (reviews in Mather 1985;Innis et al 1986;Ossenkopp et al 1986). However, in those studies determinations of performance were made after, rather than during, exposure to the magnetic stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The results of a number of other studies have also reported that exposure to stronger static and time-varying magnetic fields have no apparent effects on a variety of measures of learning and memory in laboratory rodents (reviews in Mather 1985;Innis et al 1986;Ossenkopp et al 1986). However, in those studies determinations of performance were made after, rather than during, exposure to the magnetic stimuli.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…There is increasing evidence that high magnetic fields (>= 4 T) interact with the vestibular system of rodents and humans, although the mechanism of interaction is unknown. Magnetic field exposure under 2 T does not appear to be detectable by humans (Schenck, 1992; Winther et al, 1999) and has been reported to have no effect on a variety of behavioral tasks in rats (Innis et al, 1986; Messmer et al, 1987; Ossenkopp et al, 1986). Surveys of workers employed and within a 4 T MRI magnet (Schenck, 1992) or 9.4 T MRI magnet (Patel et al, 2008) reported sensations of vertigo, nausea, and illusions of movement that have been attributed to vestibular perturbations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…MF exposure under 2 T does not appear to be detectable by humans and has been reported to have no effect on a variety of behavioral tasks in rats (28,42,45,56,65). However, there have been reports of vertigo and nausea in humans between 4 T and 8.4 T using MRI machines, suggesting stimulation of visceral or sensory systems (29,56).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…conditioned taste aversion; locomotor circling; estrogen; progesterone ADVANCES IN MAGNETIC RESONANCE imaging (MRI) are leading to the development of more powerful MRI machines capable of producing higher-resolution images, but the sensory, neural, or somatic effects of high-strength static magnetic fields (MFs) on mammals and humans are virtually unexplored. MF exposure under 2 T does not appear to be detectable by humans and has been reported to have no effect on a variety of behavioral tasks in rats (28,42,45,56,65). However, there have been reports of vertigo and nausea in humans between 4 T and 8.4 T using MRI machines, suggesting stimulation of visceral or sensory systems (29, 56).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%