1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0893-133x(98)00083-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Effects of Psychomotor Stimulant Infusions into Amygdaloid Nuclei

Abstract: The role of amygdaloid nuclei in locomotion, stereotypy, and conditioned place preference (CPP)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consistent with this idea, BLA lesions do not disrupt responding for water or access to an estrous female on a continuous reinforcement schedule Everitt et al, 1989). Furthermore, intra-BLA infusion of D-amphetamine does not elicit conditioned place preference (O'Dell et al, 1999). These findings mitigate against the possibility that Damphetamine served simply as a drug prime in the present study, in addition to the already noted fact that intra-BLA infusions of D-amphetamine did not alter responding under extinction conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Consistent with this idea, BLA lesions do not disrupt responding for water or access to an estrous female on a continuous reinforcement schedule Everitt et al, 1989). Furthermore, intra-BLA infusion of D-amphetamine does not elicit conditioned place preference (O'Dell et al, 1999). These findings mitigate against the possibility that Damphetamine served simply as a drug prime in the present study, in addition to the already noted fact that intra-BLA infusions of D-amphetamine did not alter responding under extinction conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The CEA, on the other hand, shows increased neuronal activity following self-stimulation of the medial forebrain bundle (Hunt and McGregor, 1998), the classic definition of brain reward. Also, infusion of amphetamine into the CEA, but not the BLA, supports conditioned place preference (O'Dell et al, 1999). Finally, cocaine itself, as opposed to cocaine cues, activates immediate early gene expression in the CEA, but not in the BLA (Neisewander et al, 2000;Ciccocioppo et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Specific lesions of the basolateral nucleus (BLA) decreased sucrose-produced place conditioning (Everitt et al 1991) and decreased the ability of a stimulus predictive of reward to elicit approach behavior (Burns et al 1993). Intra-amygdaloid infusions of amphetamine, and to a lesser extent, cocaine, supported the development of a conditioned place preference (O'Dell et al 1999), although these effects were manifest to a greater extent when the infusions were restricted to the central nucleus. Of particular relevance to the development of sensitization, infusions of amphetamine into the basolateral nucleus potentiated the subsequent development of reward/stimulus associations and facilitated the acquisition of discriminative approach behavior (Hitchcott et al 1997).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%