Behavioral measures of attention and cognitive control during a new auditory working memory paradigm

Abstract

Proactive control is the ability to manipulate and maintain goal-relevant information within working memory (WM), allowing individuals to selectively attend to important information while inhibiting irrelevant distractions. Deficits in proactive control may cause multiple cognitive impairments seen in schizophrenia. However, studies of cognitive control have largely relied on visual tasks, even though the functional deficits in schizophrenia are more frequent and severe in the auditory domain (i.e., hallucinations). Hence, we developed an auditory analogue of a visual ignore/suppress paradigm. Healthy adults (N = 40) listened to a series of four letters (600-ms stimulus onset asynchrony) presented alternately to each ear, followed by a 3.2-s maintenance interval and a probe. Participants were directed either to selectively ignore (I) the to-be-presented letters at one ear, to suppress (S) letters already presented to one ear, or to remember (R) all presented letters. The critical cue was provided either before (I) or after (S) the encoding series, or simultaneously with the probe (R). The probes were encoding items presented to either the attended/ not suppressed ear ("valid") or the ignored/suppressed ear ("lure"), or were not presented ("control"). Replicating prior findings during visual ignore/suppress tasks, response sensitivity and latency revealed poorer performance for lure than for control trials, particularly during the suppress condition. Shorter suppress than remember latencies suggested a behavioral advantage when discarding encoded items from WM. The paradigm-related internal consistencies and 1-week test-retest reliabilities (n = 38) were good to excellent. Our findings validate these auditory WM tasks as a reliable manipulation of proactive control and set the stage for studies with schizophrenia patients who experience auditory hallucinations.

Understanding mental fatigue and its detection: a comparative analysis of assessments and tools

“…The lengthy testing period raises potential compliance and burden issues ( Kas, Serretti & Marston, 2019 ). Also, although this method of detection is not as subjective as questionnaires’ responses and able to provide objective measurements ( e.g ., quantifiable data from pressing a key), the ANT task is more of a cognitive assessment which is mainly used for inferring purposes ( Kayser et al, 2020 ). This may lack clarity and direct observation that potentially lead to questions about its validity in detecting mental fatigue.…”

Does Age Matter? Using Neuroscience Approaches to Understand Consumers’ Behavior towards Purchasing the Sustainable Product Online

“…For instance, how does aging affect consumer responses to decisions? To address the most fundamental issues related to consumer behavior, including the differential response of older adults to marketing campaigns compared to younger (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and middle-aged adults, marketers should consider ways to communicate with older consumers [8,14]. This involves understanding age-related changes in sensory function, cognition, needs, motivations, judgments, and decision-making processes [15].…”

“…Moreover, measuring the parameters of brain waves and eye movements when shopping online allows more accurate judgment of perceptual and emotional behaviors [27]. Attention refers to the ability of participants to maintain behavioral or cognitive focus in the face of distractors or competing stimuli [28]. Therefore, attention allows individuals to select relevant stimuli from the environment and ignore irrelevant stimuli [29].…”