1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(84)90667-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral patterns of Aplysia fasciata along the Mediterranean Coast of Israel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the buccal mass of Pleurobranchaea has been reported to be involved in gill grooming (McClellan, 1982) we have never observed gill grooming in Aplysia, either in laboratory tanks or in field studies in California (Kupfermann and Carew, 1974) and Israel (Susswein et al, 1984b, A. J. Susswein and I. Kupfermann, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Behaviors Involving the Buccal Mass Of Aplysiamentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Although the buccal mass of Pleurobranchaea has been reported to be involved in gill grooming (McClellan, 1982) we have never observed gill grooming in Aplysia, either in laboratory tanks or in field studies in California (Kupfermann and Carew, 1974) and Israel (Susswein et al, 1984b, A. J. Susswein and I. Kupfermann, unpublished observations).…”
Section: Behaviors Involving the Buccal Mass Of Aplysiamentioning
confidence: 59%
“…(6) During the consummatory phase of feeding behavior, there may be small rhythmic movements of the neck during repetitive biting movements. Neck movements also occur during reproductive mating behavior (Susswein et al, 1984;Ferguson et al, 1989;Bernheim and Mayeri, 1995) and phototactic responses (Kuenzi and Carew, 1991), but we have not examined the role of CC5 during these responses.…”
Section: Combinatorial Codes During Multiple Behaviors In Which Cc5 Amentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The limitation of mobility of individuals due to copulatory load may affect their subsequent mating opportunity as males. Since in Ap(ysia it is generally the future "male" that approaches its prospective partner (Leonard & Lukowiak, 1983;Susswein et al, 1984;Carefoot, 1987;Pennings, 1991 ), less mobile female-acting individuals may be less successful in acting as males to obtain preferable female partners than single ones. Two pieces of evidence showing this expectation were obtained in this population: ( 1) female-acting individuals mated with smaller female partners relative to themselves, compared with single individuals (Table 2; P=0.020; Mann-Whitney U-test); (2) they did not choose large female partners from available candidates (individuals within 1.5 m that were not already copulating as females) while single ones did (Yusa, pers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%