1990
DOI: 10.1002/dev.420230202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral reactions to gustatory stimuli in young chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus)

Abstract: Freely-moving, posthatch chicks were individually presented 2 concentrations each of quinine, citric acid, fructose, sucrose, sodium saccharin, and distilled water and their behavioral reactions were videotaped and analyzed. Already during the first posthatch day distinct rejection responses to quinine and citric acid could be recognized. Prolonged head shaking and beak clapping episodes were the most dominant features of these reactions. While responses to water and sweet stimuli could be interpreted as accep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tas1r2 also is known to be pseudogenized in chicken, tongueless Western clawed frogs, and vampire bats (11,15). The loss of the sweet taste receptor in chicken and vampire bats is consistent with their sweet insensitive behavior (16,17). It is yet to be established how Western clawed frogs respond to sweeteners.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tas1r2 also is known to be pseudogenized in chicken, tongueless Western clawed frogs, and vampire bats (11,15). The loss of the sweet taste receptor in chicken and vampire bats is consistent with their sweet insensitive behavior (16,17). It is yet to be established how Western clawed frogs respond to sweeteners.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The response of chickens to different tastes was found to be stable from the growth period until sexual maturity (Ganchrow et al, 1990). Furthermore, differences were reported between hens types both in the number of taste buds and in taste sensitivity (Kudo et al, 2008;Kudo et al, 2010).…”
Section: Pigsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These specific affective reactions to differing taste stimuli are strikingly similar across cultures [25,34,36] and species [27,[37][38][39][40], also suggesting a basic biological underpinning for the flavors and foods youngsters prefer and avoid. Thus, when we examine children's dietary patterns from the perspective of the ontogeny of taste development, the foods children naturally prefer are not surprising and reflect their basic biology.…”
Section: Biological Substrates Of Flavor Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%