2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2013.09.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral responses of batoid elasmobranchs to prey-simulating electric fields are correlated to peripheral sensory morphology and ecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intra-specific variation in total pore count was high (>10%) for all target species, as found in other studies (Jordan 2008, Bedore et al 2014, but is unlikely due to observer error owing to the marking methodology employed. Future research should aim to understand to what extent, if any, such variation has on electrosensory capability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intra-specific variation in total pore count was high (>10%) for all target species, as found in other studies (Jordan 2008, Bedore et al 2014, but is unlikely due to observer error owing to the marking methodology employed. Future research should aim to understand to what extent, if any, such variation has on electrosensory capability.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, the increase in TL with age necessarily results in a decrease in pore density as pore number remains constant. High pore densities are correlated with less mobile prey (like epifaunal and infaunal crustaceans) whereas lower pore densities are correlated with more mobile prey (like cephalopods and teleosts), due to a reduction in resolution as pore density decreases (with age-related growth), leaving the animal less able to detect immobile prey items (Jordan 2008, Bedore et al 2014. It is therefore likely that the ontogenetic diet shift as described by Mauchline & Gordon (1983) is driven by both a reduced ability to detect more immobile prey and an increase in mouth gape size that allows it to target larger prey items.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B 282: 20151886 elasmobranch predators readily respond to weak dipole electric fields that simulate prey DC voltage with a feeding strike. These strikes are initiated within 50 cm of the dipole and demonstrate a sensitivity of less than 1 nV cm 21 [21,22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the longfin squid Loligo pealeii stops swimming and drops to the substrate as a way to reduce motion that signals its presence to nearby teleost predators [9]. Cephalopods, and in particular S. officinalis, present an ideal system for studying non-visual crypsis as they fall prey to a diverse group of predators [14 -20], many of which employ acute, non-visual sensory modalities while foraging [21][22][23][24]. For instance, elasmobranch fishes consume a variety of cryptic prey, including several cephalopod species [15,16,25,26], and can locate prey using their electrosensory system alone [21,22,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All sharks and rays present an elaborate electrosensory system composed by groups of subcutaneous 32 BIANCA S. RANGEL et al electroreceptors organs, known as "ampullae of Lorenzini" (aL). The system is composed by a complex web of nerve fibers, canals and external pores ranging in size, shape and composition, related to particular needs of each species (Murray 1960, Kajiura 2001, Wueringer and Tibbetts 2008, Kajiura et al 2010, Wueringer et al 2011, 2012, Kempster et al 2012, Bedore et al 2014. The ability to detect weak bioelectric fields evolved independently in several lines of vertebrates, emphasizing the importance of this sense in a variety of behaviors (Bullock et al 1983, Collin 2010, 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%