The Wiley‐Blackwell Handbook of Disordered Gambling 2013
DOI: 10.1002/9781118316078.ch4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Risk Factors in Disordered Gambling and Treatment Implications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Gambling Space Model (GSM) has been recently proposed to integrate these approaches to heterogeneity in gambling disorder (Navas, Billieux, Verdejo-García, & Perales, 2018). Inspired by the Pathways Model (Blaszczynski & Nower, 2002), gambling addiction is modelled as mostly driven by instrumental and Pavlovian conditioning processes, linked to the reinforcement schedules present in gambling scenarios (Delfabbro, 2014). Beyond these, however, different psychobiology-informed, affect/emotion-driven constructs play different roles in shaping GD vulnerability and development (see also Williams, Grisham, Erskine, & Cassedy, 2012;Maniaci, Picone, van Holst, Bolloni, Scardina, & Cannizaro, 2017).…”
Section: A Model To Account For Gamblers' Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gambling Space Model (GSM) has been recently proposed to integrate these approaches to heterogeneity in gambling disorder (Navas, Billieux, Verdejo-García, & Perales, 2018). Inspired by the Pathways Model (Blaszczynski & Nower, 2002), gambling addiction is modelled as mostly driven by instrumental and Pavlovian conditioning processes, linked to the reinforcement schedules present in gambling scenarios (Delfabbro, 2014). Beyond these, however, different psychobiology-informed, affect/emotion-driven constructs play different roles in shaping GD vulnerability and development (see also Williams, Grisham, Erskine, & Cassedy, 2012;Maniaci, Picone, van Holst, Bolloni, Scardina, & Cannizaro, 2017).…”
Section: A Model To Account For Gamblers' Individual Differencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The premise underlying cooling-off periods is that individuals, because of deficits in emotional regulation, operant condition, or financial pressure to chase losses, may impulsively decide to continue play (Delfabbro, 2014;Lesieur, 1984;Williams, Grisham, Erskine, & Cassidy, 2012), or increase preset limits to extend current or future sessions of play. Cooling-off periods are important in offering gamblers time to reconsider and re-evaluate their decisions to gamble, particularly decisions made impulsively and without consideration of their consequences.…”
Section: Cooling-offmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An individual's capacity to self-regulate can be undermined by a series of factors, including: inability to regulate emotions (Scannel et al, 2000; and the use of emotion over problem-focused coping strategies (Blaszczynski, McConaghy, & Frankova, 1990); erroneous gambling cognitions (see Hodgins & Holub, 2007;Petry, 2005); heightened states of arousal (see Abrams & Krushner, 2004;Delfabbro, 2014); and neurotransmitter deregulation (Humphreys & Richards, 2014;Gouudriaan, van Holst, Veltman, & den Brink, 2014). In recognition of the difficulties gamblers have in maintaining self-control during periods of heightened arousal or emotion (Sharpe, Tarrier, Schotte, & Spense, 1995;Baudinet & Blaszczynski, 2012;William, Grisham, Erskine, & Cassidy, 2012) it is essential from a harm minimisation perspective to implement strategies aimed at facilitating player control during gambling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…unlimited availability, gambling in turn, frequency of betting, parallel gambling activities, lack of social control, etc.) provide strong impulses reinforcing urge to play and leading to the development of a gambling disorder (8)(9)(10). Young men in particular represent a highly vulnerable group (11).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%