2002
DOI: 10.1075/aicr.42.13rot
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral synchronization in human conversational interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of parameter values was guided by previous studies and by preliminary inspection of the data. Previous works [5], [50] showed that plus or minus 2s is meaningful for the production and perception of head nods (i.e. pitch) and turns (i.e.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of parameter values was guided by previous studies and by preliminary inspection of the data. Previous works [5], [50] showed that plus or minus 2s is meaningful for the production and perception of head nods (i.e. pitch) and turns (i.e.…”
Section: Data Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dynamic group behavior often involves complex aspects of interpersonal coordination that are necessary for behaving together effectively in a group as a function of time (Haken et al, 1985;Semin, 2007). Coordination in time, such as in groups performing music together (Aschersleben, 2003) or in small group conversational dynamics (Rotondo and Boker, 2002), often involves complementarily aligned behavior that requires attention to a variety of social cues and distinctive interpretations and responses. This introduces the question of how such alignment in behavior would be regulated through mindfulness.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These may then be cognitively and physically acted upon, by both conscious and unconscious mechanisms over a period of time. Two peoples' innate drives and their rational thoughts and behavior may become synchronized (Rotondo and Boker, 2002;Semin and Cacioppo, 2008). As regards telepathy and synchronicity, it would then perhaps not be so surprising when two individuals think of each other or reencounter each other unexpectedly or "coincidentally" at the same time.…”
Section: Background and Evidence For A New Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%