1981
DOI: 10.2307/1444036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioral Thermoregulation and Social Interactions of Bluegills, Lepomis macrochirus

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While thermal history has long been recognized as influencing thermal responses in fish (Fry 1967, Brett 1970, Fry & Hochachka 1970, in terms of thermal distribution, a number of other factors, both biotic and abiotic, have also been found to play an important role. These include season (Sullivan & Fisher 1953, Fry & Hochachka 1970, Olla et al 1980, food availability (Neill & Magnuson 1974), nutritional state (Javaid & Anderson 1967, Stuntz & Magnuson 1976), competition and/or predation , Crowder & Magnuson 1982, time of day (Medvick & Miller 1979), salinity (Garside & Morrison 1977), age (McCauley & Read 1973, Kwain & McCauley 1978, social factors (Medvick et al 1981), pathological condition (Reynolds et al 1976) and habitat requirements (Olla et al , 1980.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While thermal history has long been recognized as influencing thermal responses in fish (Fry 1967, Brett 1970, Fry & Hochachka 1970, in terms of thermal distribution, a number of other factors, both biotic and abiotic, have also been found to play an important role. These include season (Sullivan & Fisher 1953, Fry & Hochachka 1970, Olla et al 1980, food availability (Neill & Magnuson 1974), nutritional state (Javaid & Anderson 1967, Stuntz & Magnuson 1976), competition and/or predation , Crowder & Magnuson 1982, time of day (Medvick & Miller 1979), salinity (Garside & Morrison 1977), age (McCauley & Read 1973, Kwain & McCauley 1978, social factors (Medvick et al 1981), pathological condition (Reynolds et al 1976) and habitat requirements (Olla et al , 1980.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These examples indicate that other abiotic entities can mask or influence the behavioral responses of fishes to oxygen. Undoubtedly biotic interactions similar to those reported for temperature (see Beitinger & Magnuson 1975, Medvick et al 1981 would also be expected to influence the behavioral responses of fishes to oxygen.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…One possibility is that the slightly higher temperatures of these trials (23.5 " C versus 22.0 C in the group trials) may have helped H. cyanoguttatus grow and compete more effectively for food. However, higher temperatures are preferred by L. macrochirus as well, including as high as 31 O C (Medvick et al 1981). It is also possible that H. cyanoguttatus mobility and growth are more suited to higher temperatures in situations involving feeding competition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%