2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2015.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of flexible piles subjected to inclined loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loading function Y ( t ), which controls the degree of nonlinearity of the system response, increases monotonically with the distance of the current stress state t to the assumed ultimate failure surface of the soil‐pile system: Ffalse(bold-italictfalse)=Ffalse(V,2.56804ptH,2.56804ptMfalse/Dfalse)=0 in the generalized loading space …”
Section: Hypoplastic Macroelement For Batter Pilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The loading function Y ( t ), which controls the degree of nonlinearity of the system response, increases monotonically with the distance of the current stress state t to the assumed ultimate failure surface of the soil‐pile system: Ffalse(bold-italictfalse)=Ffalse(V,2.56804ptH,2.56804ptMfalse/Dfalse)=0 in the generalized loading space …”
Section: Hypoplastic Macroelement For Batter Pilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in the generalized loading space. 5,15,61,[71][72][73] As in Li et al, 58 the loading function is defined as follows. For each loading state t inside the failure surface, an image state t * is defined on the failure surface by a simple projection from the origin of the loading space:…”
Section: Definition Of Vector Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) The piles are assumed to be fixed in the slope and not to fail, with enough strength and flexible rigidity. Although the structural properties of the piles could significantly affect their behavior, they are not discussed in this paper, which is primarily focused on the stability of reinforced slopes.…”
Section: Calculation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The required lateral resisting force from the stabilizing piles can be evaluated using either the aforementioned pile‐slope or pile‐landslide interaction analysis or the conventional stability analysis (eg, Bishop and Janbu). With respect to the selection of the design of stabilizing piles, the following aspects should be explicitly considered: (1) the pile diameter and pile structural properties should be selected such that the stabilizing piles could provide sufficient bearing capability against the internal forces and deformation of the stabilizing piles (eg, previous studies), otherwise, the stabilizing piles might fail because of the excessive deformation, pile cracking, or structural damage; (2) the pile spacing should be selected such that an effective soil arching could be formed between adjacent piles (eg, previous studies), otherwise, the soils might flow through the space between adjacent piles; (3) the pile length should be selected such that the embedded depth within the lower stable layer could be sufficient to provide the required lateral resisting force (eg, Chmoulian and Viggiani), otherwise, the failure of the geomaterials (ie, soils) originated in the upper unstable layer might extend into the lower stable layer; and (4) the pile position should be selected such that the reinforcement effectiveness, which could be captured by the increase in the FS of the reinforced slope or landslide, could be maximized (eg, Ito et al and Won et al).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%