2015
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-015-0516-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of Loaded Cross-Laminated Timber Wall Elements in Fire Conditions

Abstract: Cross-laminated timber (CLT) is increasingly being used in medium-rise timber buildings for a number of reasons, such as rapidity of construction, cost effectiveness and robustness. Like for other building materials, verification of the loadbearing performance in fire conditions is an important issue. Experimental fire tests have been performed on loaded CLT wall elements at research institutes in Sweden and Italy. In total, three large-scale and four medium-scale tests have been carried out. The aim was to ga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, a few millimetres difference in the assumed ZSL can have a major impact on the predicted deflection, and hence on the predicted failure time. This issue has also been discussed by Schmid et al [11], who showed that CLT wall elements exposed to standard fires failed when the charring had reduced the initial strong parallel layer to only a few millimetres. On this basis, Schmid et al [11] subsequently proposed that a minimum residual depth (of 3 mm) of the strong layers should be imposed in design to account for uncertainties in the charring rates arising from changes in density, moisture content, or fire exposure.…”
Section: Comments On the Reduced Cross Section Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, a few millimetres difference in the assumed ZSL can have a major impact on the predicted deflection, and hence on the predicted failure time. This issue has also been discussed by Schmid et al [11], who showed that CLT wall elements exposed to standard fires failed when the charring had reduced the initial strong parallel layer to only a few millimetres. On this basis, Schmid et al [11] subsequently proposed that a minimum residual depth (of 3 mm) of the strong layers should be imposed in design to account for uncertainties in the charring rates arising from changes in density, moisture content, or fire exposure.…”
Section: Comments On the Reduced Cross Section Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…However, the constant 7 mm ZSL depth currently suggested in design codes [4] is based largely on models calibrated from a relatively small number of flexural standard furnace tests on glulam beams undertaken in the 1980s [8]. The applicability of the current ZSL value to CLT in general [9], and to engineered timber compression elements more specifically [10,11] is doubtful.…”
Section: The Reduced Cross Section Methods and Zero Strength Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional research aimed at defining charring velocity β and thickness of thermally modified layer of material d o was conducted by Schmidt [81] and Fragiacomo [82] for the case of CLT plates, i.e. by Schmidt et al [83] for the case of CLT panels. General conclusion was that, in the foreseeable future, the work should be focused on optimisation of the value d 0 , as related to the required fire resistance time for CLT (30, 60 and 90 minutes), or as related to the CLT composition (thickness, arrangement and number of layers).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The papers compiled within this special issue of Fire Technology address a range of key fire safety issues and applications of timber in modern buildings, including: the structural fire resistance for both solid timber [5] and engineered timber elements in glulam [6] or CLT [7], and light frame engineered timber flooring systems [8] as well as connections in timber [9,10]; the specific fire dynamics in building compartments made from massive or light frame timber elements [11]; the fire protection capabilities of timber materials [12]; and the fire-safe use of timber cladding materials for multi-storey buildings [13].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%