2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour of neonicotinoids in contrasting soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
18
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
18
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sorption coefficients can vary significantly based on factors such as solution ion content, 68 and neonicotinoids such as imidacloprid have been shown to be highly influenced by adsorbent organic matter content. 69 Nonetheless, the sorption behavior of imidacloprid in the present study is consistent with these previous results.…”
Section: Pesticide Treatment Potentialsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Sorption coefficients can vary significantly based on factors such as solution ion content, 68 and neonicotinoids such as imidacloprid have been shown to be highly influenced by adsorbent organic matter content. 69 Nonetheless, the sorption behavior of imidacloprid in the present study is consistent with these previous results.…”
Section: Pesticide Treatment Potentialsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The analysed soils sorbed thiacloprid more strongly than acetamiprid, with a markedly faster initial reaction phase: in the first 15 min, an average of 45% of the applied insecticide dose of thiacloprid and 37% of the acetamiprid was already sorbed. In Mediterranean soils, Rodriguez-Liebana et al also found significant thiacloprid sorption in the first 15 min of the reaction, up to the amount of 35% [ 48 ], while Aseperi et al reported an extremely high percentage of sorption in UK soils (79–82%) during the rapid phase of the reaction (15 min) [ 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that, from the total neonicotinoid active substance applied in seed treatment, only 2–20% is sorbed by the crop, while the rest is transferred on or through the soil ecosystem [ 12 , 13 , 29 ] (Note that application rates are up to 0.62 kg and 0.57 kg active ingredient per hectare for acetamiprid and thiacloprid, respectively [ 30 , 31 ]). The fate and distribution of those active substances are controlled by the sorption, desorption and degradation processes, which, in turn, depend on soil physico-chemical properties [ 19 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. Generally, soil degradation is faster for acetamiprid, with a half-life in the field of 3 days, compared to 8.8 days for thiacloprid [ 17 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The partition of IMI between clay and SOM is thus biased towards the SOM to a much greater extent compared to DIM. This view is consistent with studies that showed that (a) the IMI sorption coefficient is an order of magnitude larger for sorption on pure humic acids compared to the one obtained on pure clay [ 60 , 70 ]; (b) IMI has a strong affinity to the hydrophobic environment [ 71 ]; (c) IMI’s pyrimidine aromatic ring tends to be embedded in the environment of aromatic amino acid residues [ 6 ], and (d) the neonicotinoids, in general, have the low affinity for soil minerals [ 72 ]. Additionally, the results for both pesticides showed a rise in K F values proportional to SOM content, as expected [ 73 , 74 ], but the correlation was nearly perfect for IMI and less so for DIM ( Figure 2 c), which further corroborates the aforementioned conclusions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%