2021
DOI: 10.1186/s40462-021-00258-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behaviour-specific habitat selection patterns of breeding barn owls

Abstract: Background The intensification of agricultural practices over the twentieth century led to a cascade of detrimental effects on ecosystems. In Europe, agri-environment schemes (AES) have since been adopted to counter the decrease in farmland biodiversity, with the promotion of extensive habitats such as wildflower strips and extensive meadows. Despite having beneficial effects documented for multiple taxa, their profitability for top farmland predators, like raptors, is still debated. Such speci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
6
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Advances in electronic tracking technologies have revolutionized our ability to monitor animal movements and behavior over extended periods of time in both terrestrial and aquatic environments. The use of radio, satellite, global positioning system (GPS), and acoustic tracking devices has expanded research on fundamental ecological topics, such as habitat requirements, dispersal, migratory routes, foraging, and home‐range characteristics (McIntyre et al, 2017 ; Powell et al, 2016 ; Séchaud et al, 2021 ; Snijders et al, 2014 ; Stanley et al, 2021 ). Each technology has strengths and limitations, and trade‐offs exist for current tracking systems depending on research questions and study species (Bridge et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in electronic tracking technologies have revolutionized our ability to monitor animal movements and behavior over extended periods of time in both terrestrial and aquatic environments. The use of radio, satellite, global positioning system (GPS), and acoustic tracking devices has expanded research on fundamental ecological topics, such as habitat requirements, dispersal, migratory routes, foraging, and home‐range characteristics (McIntyre et al, 2017 ; Powell et al, 2016 ; Séchaud et al, 2021 ; Snijders et al, 2014 ; Stanley et al, 2021 ). Each technology has strengths and limitations, and trade‐offs exist for current tracking systems depending on research questions and study species (Bridge et al, 2011 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This species is a farmland nocturnal raptor of medium size, that preys almost exclusively on small mammals 37 , 38 . It breeds in farms and barns, and hunts preferentially in extensive open habitats, such as meadows and wildflower strips 39 42 . However, it can also exploit more intensive habitats, like grasslands and cereal crops, but shows a strong avoidance for forests and urbanized areas 40 42 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although birds in both the CPF and commuter group exhibited central place foraging behavior, their foraging movements occurred over markedly different spatial and temporal scales; the commuters specifically made full day (median ~ 6 h) movements between their roost sites and geographically distinct foraging areas, as is typical of commuting species [ 15 ], whereas the CPF group typically made shorter movements (median ~ 0.7 h). Commuting behavior is common in seabirds, waterbirds, wading birds, and owls [ 13 , 14 , 16 , 93 , 94 ]; however, this study is the first to document commuting behavior in a nectarivorous bird, to the best of our knowledge. Though commuting behavior is not usually observed in small passerines (but see [ 95 ]), it is still unknown whether this behavior is uncommon, or just poorly documented due to logistical constraints in tracking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%