Background and aims
Excessive use of the internet is increasingly recognized as a global public health concern. Individual studies have reported cognitive impairment in problematic internet use (PIU), but have suffered from various methodological limitations. Confirmation of cognitive deficits in PIU would support the neurobiological plausibility of this disorder. The aim of this study was to conduct a rigorous meta-analysis of cognitive performance in PIU from case-control studies; and to assess the impact of study quality, main type of online behaviour (e.g. gaming), and other parameters on the findings.
Methods
Systematic literature review was conducted of peer-reviewed case-controlled studies comparing cognition in PIU (broadly defined) to healthy controls. Findings were extracted and subjected to a meta-analysis where at least four publications existed for a given cognitive domain of interest.
Results
The meta-analysis comprised 2922 participants across 40 studies. Compared to controls, PIU was associated with significant impairment in inhibitory control (Stroop task Hedge’s g = 0.53[SE 0.19-0.87], Stop-signal task g = 0.42[0.17-0.66], Go/No-Go task g = 0.51[0.26-0.75]), decision-making (g=0.49[0.28-0.70]), and working memory (g=0.40[0.20-0.82]). Whether or not gaming was the predominant type of online behavior did not significantly moderate the observed cognitive effects; nor did age, gender, geographical area of reporting, or the presence of co-morbidities.
Conclusions
Problematic internet use (PIU) is associated with decrements across a range of neuropsychological domains, irrespective of geographical location, supporting its cross-cultural and biological validity. These findings also suggest a common neurobiological vulnerability across PIU behaviors, including gaming, rather than a dissimilar neurocognitive profile for internet gaming disorder.