1992
DOI: 10.1080/00480169.1992.35698
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural and heart rate responses to velvet antler removal in red deer

Abstract: Heart rate and behaviour during and following velvet antler removal were monitored in yearling red deer stags to determine the extent to which this procedure was perceived by the deer to be aversive. Nine stags normally kept at pasture were habituated over 5 weeks to the following daily handling procedure. Each deer was fitted with a harness containing a heart rate monitor. It was then allowed to run through a fixed course in a deer yard, restrained for 40 s in a mechanical deer crush, and then confined for 3.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reduced eating and increased lying found in animals kept indoors following velvet removal (Pollard et al, 1992b) were not seen in the present study however. A possible explanation for this difference is that in the present study, animals were released immediately to pasture, as is normal practice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Reduced eating and increased lying found in animals kept indoors following velvet removal (Pollard et al, 1992b) were not seen in the present study however. A possible explanation for this difference is that in the present study, animals were released immediately to pasture, as is normal practice.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…1992). Stags respond to painful stimuli applied to velvet antler (Pollard et al. 1992) and scientific evaluation of techniques for antler removal clearly indicates the need for analgesia (Wilson 1989; Matthews et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parsons and Helphinstine (1969) used a dark box for handling cattle, and Pollard and Littlejohn (1994) and Pollard et al (1992) used a dark room for deer. Deer in a dark room lose their flight zone and can be touched by people.…”
Section: The Influence Of Darkness or Light On Handlingmentioning
confidence: 99%