1991
DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(05)80072-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural differences between artificially selected aggressive and non-aggressive mice: response to apomorphine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, in rodents and pigs [1,9], the DA receptor agonist apomorphine produced a greater enhancement of stereotyped behavior in proactive coping individuals than in reactive coping individuals. Furthermore, it was shown that proactive mice have lower 5-HT neurotransmission [27] and (possibly), consequently, a more sensitive (postsynaptic) 5-HT receptor system as compared to reactive mice [44].…”
Section: Da and 5-ht Turnover Coping And Feather Peckingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in rodents and pigs [1,9], the DA receptor agonist apomorphine produced a greater enhancement of stereotyped behavior in proactive coping individuals than in reactive coping individuals. Furthermore, it was shown that proactive mice have lower 5-HT neurotransmission [27] and (possibly), consequently, a more sensitive (postsynaptic) 5-HT receptor system as compared to reactive mice [44].…”
Section: Da and 5-ht Turnover Coping And Feather Peckingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals at one end of the distribution are rather bold in approaching novel stimuli, and have a high tendency to develop routine-like behaviour patterns that are relatively independent of actual information. Individuals at the other end, in contrast, show more caution in making decisions, monitor even a relatively familiar environment extensively, and are therefore able to Xexibly adjust their behaviour to subtle environmental changes (see Benus et al 1991;Koolhaas et al 2001 for review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mouse strains were produced by artificial selection for attack latency about 25 years ago [26] and were amply characterized since than [27][28][29][30][31][32]. In brief, SALs show dramatically lower attack latencies, and higher attack counts than LALs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%