Automata, Languages and Programming
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0036900
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural equivalence relations induced by programming logics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A modal characteristic of observational equivalence is given in [ 161 and is further elaborated in [4] and [32]. Our modal characterization theorem is modeled on [35], but is actually a minor variation on a result first proved by C. Stirling [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modal characteristic of observational equivalence is given in [ 161 and is further elaborated in [4] and [32]. Our modal characterization theorem is modeled on [35], but is actually a minor variation on a result first proved by C. Stirling [33].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are known to preserve all temporal logic properties [20], including nonblocking. Observation equivalence alone is responsible for a substantial state-space reduction in compositional nonblocking verification of FAs [11].…”
Section: Symbolic Observation Equivalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bisimulations on transition systems provide a powerful concept (see [1,3] ), but many authors argue ( [4,6,28], to mention but a few) that this yields an inadequate description of concurrency; specifically what is questioned is Milner's expansion theorem [17,14], expressing a simulation of concurrency by sequential non-determinism. Roughly speaking (a I b) = ab + ba, thus the parallel composition operator can be eliminated (from finite terms), whence it is not primitive.…”
Section: (At(b + ~)) + (Aib) + ((A + C)ib) = (Al(b + 4) + ((~ + ~)Tb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we adapt Brookes and Rounds terminology (see [3,1] The only point to check is that the composition of invariant relations is itself invariant m We shall call this equisimulation the equipollence with respect to T and sometimes use the alternative notation p × q (T) instead of p x T qWe are in fact interested in transitions labelled by actions, that is classes of structures or terms. Let us ambiguously denote ~PI and IP~ the isomorphism class of the A-LES P and the =e-class of the term p. Then we define the transition relations ~ and…”
Section: Equipoflencementioning
confidence: 99%