2016
DOI: 10.1177/0971685816650579
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural Red Flags of Fraud— A Qualitative Assessment

Abstract: Fraud literature suggests that the presence or absence of fraudulent intentions can be assessed by a close scrutiny of human behaviour. This can help identify prospective fraud perpetrators. Given this consideration, the present study qualitatively explores the observations and views of people who have personally investigated or closely observed a fraud/fraudster. Twenty-six interviews help condense a checklist of behavioural red flags of fraud. The themes of strong ambition, social aloofness, extended working… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
27
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Although few studies report social isolation as a red flag of fraud (ACFE, 2014, 2016; Morales et al, 2014), others report some exceptions. A recent study indicates that fraud perpetrators typically placed in upper management positions are outgoing, popular and extremely social (Sandhu, 2016). Further, the data indicate that 29.3 per cent of fraud perpetrators were dissatisfied with their current jobs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although few studies report social isolation as a red flag of fraud (ACFE, 2014, 2016; Morales et al, 2014), others report some exceptions. A recent study indicates that fraud perpetrators typically placed in upper management positions are outgoing, popular and extremely social (Sandhu, 2016). Further, the data indicate that 29.3 per cent of fraud perpetrators were dissatisfied with their current jobs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Refusing promotions/postings/leave was identified as a red flag in 12.2 per cent of cases. It is believed that the extra income from fraudulent activities encourages fraudsters to refuse lucrative professional opportunities (Sandhu, 2016). Some literature also documents instances of executives, later booked for fraud, operating much below responsibility levels for a significant period of time before the fraud was exposed (Coenen, 2008; Singleton & Singleton, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioural factors have been recognised as the reason why fraud take place (Cressey, 1950;Dittenhofer , 1995;Sandhu, 2016). The 10/80/10 principle has been used in fraud prevention circles to assess the chances of fraud taking place (Buchanan-Cook, 2006).…”
Section: Behavioural Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They found that red flags vary in effectiveness; specifically, opportunity red flags were identified by the external auditors as most significant in detecting fraud. To explore behavioral red flags, Sandhu [40] interviewed 26 individuals who had been personally involved in either a fraud investigation or a fraud observation. Interviewees highlighted the following behavioral characteristics as red flags: strong ambition, social aloofness, extended working hours, dissatisfaction with the current job, justification of unethical behavior, personal problems, and living standards disproportionate to current means.…”
Section: ) Detection Metrics For Possible Fraudmentioning
confidence: 99%