Cognitive Ecology of Pollination 2001
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511542268.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural responses of pollinators to variation in floral display size and their influences on the evolution of floral traits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

13
148
2
3

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
13
148
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show that S. longicauda plants subjected to pollen limitation develop larger floral displays, which should enhance their attractiveness to pollinators (see Ohashi & Yahara 2001). This benefit was probably weak in our experiment, because moths were so common that all plants received visits during a single night's exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results show that S. longicauda plants subjected to pollen limitation develop larger floral displays, which should enhance their attractiveness to pollinators (see Ohashi & Yahara 2001). This benefit was probably weak in our experiment, because moths were so common that all plants received visits during a single night's exposure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We hypothesize that such adjustment of display size allows plants to benefit from contrasting advantages, depending on pollinator abundance. When pollinators visit infrequently, large displays are advantageous because they attract more pollinators (reviewed by Ohashi & Yahara 2001), which should increase a plant's likelihood of pollen import and export. In contrast, when pollinators visit often, the advantage turns to small displays, because they experience less self-pollination between flowers (geitonogamy: Harder & Barrett 1996;Snow et al 1996), thereby limiting inbreeding in self-compatible species and leaving more pollen on pollinators to be exported to other plants (reviewed by Harder et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the number of open flowers, or floral display, could also affect the abundance and diversity of species observed in this study (Ohashi & Yahara 2001). Within the studied areas, and excluding some trees species (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…[17], [18] and [19] found that the three botanical families with more bee plant species were Asteraceae, Myrtaceae and Fabaceae and [20] mention that the the two most attractive plant families to bees were Asteraceae (which provide pollen and nectar) and Lamiaceae (which provide nectar). Fabaceae is a very large family in tropical and subtropical South American habitats, with 2801 species in Brazil [21] and is very visited by bees, the flowers often shaken to free the pollen out of the porate anthers (buzzing) [22]. Asteraceae totals 2064 species in Brazil [23] and shows a floral display of the open type, much sought after by bees because of the ease to land, the conspicuousness of the flowers in the wild and the arrangement of the inflorescences opening in sequence, offering new supplies every day [24].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%