2012
DOI: 10.1080/02642069.2011.582497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural responses to service encounter involving failure and recovery: the influence of contextual factors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
1
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
20
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, effective service recovery leads to customer satisfaction and aids in maintaining a positive relationship with them (Fang et al, 2012). However, prior studies suggest that customers' justice perceptions are influenced by various contextual factors (Matilla, 2001;de Matos et al, 2012;Sengupta et al, 2014). Thus, an understanding of these contextual factors aids managers in delivering suitable and successful recovery strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, effective service recovery leads to customer satisfaction and aids in maintaining a positive relationship with them (Fang et al, 2012). However, prior studies suggest that customers' justice perceptions are influenced by various contextual factors (Matilla, 2001;de Matos et al, 2012;Sengupta et al, 2014). Thus, an understanding of these contextual factors aids managers in delivering suitable and successful recovery strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The more intense or severe the service failure, the greater the customer's perceived loss. Previous research suggests that the severity of the service failure is influential in the evaluation of a service provider after a service failure [22].…”
Section: ) Service Failure Sre and Srpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on past studies, severity is found to be negatively related to trust (Weun et al 2004;McQuilken 2010;Bansal & Zahedi 2015) while other studies suggest that trust erosion could be independent of severity (Wang & Huff 2007;Elangovan et al 2015). In the context of Halal products, trust is the most important attitudinal factor in determining product choice and behavior, just as post-recovery satisfaction and perceived justice are for service failure (Yim et al 2003;Hess Jr. 2008;Matos et al 2012) Bejou and Palmer (1998) found that trust decline is greater for a major failure compared to a minor failure, but the effects are non-linear with very recent and very long-term customers showing more forgiveness for the mistakes of the company. In particular, Weun et al (2004) and Bansal and Zahedi (2015) suggest that severity is negatively related to trust.…”
Section: Severity Of Violation On Halalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…an unfavourable exchange), they will feel betrayed and engage in negative behavior directed towards the organization (Gregoire et al 2009). Empirical studies found that failure severity lead to anger and desire for revenge (Joireman et al 2013), intentions to switch (Swanson & Hsu 2009;Riaz & Khan 2016) and negative word-of-mouth (NWOM) (Wetzer et al 2007;Matos et al 2012). Therefore, when consumers perceived a more severe violation, they were more likely to affect trust recovery and anti-consumption behaviors.…”
Section: Severity Of Violation On Halalmentioning
confidence: 99%