1989
DOI: 10.1016/0376-6357(89)90008-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behavioural strategies of aggressive and non-aggressive male mice in active shock avoidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this regard it has been shown in rodents that heritable stress coping strategies are characterized by individual differences in aggression (Benus, et al, 1991). Moreover, it has also been shown that aggressive individuals show exclusively proactive behaviour as a response to stress, while non-aggressive individuals can respond both reactively and proactively (Benus, et al, 1989). This latter point may offer in part an explanation of why the two different strains of rainbow trout in our study responded similarly to an aversive stimulus and sometimes they responded differently.…”
Section: Open Field Testsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In this regard it has been shown in rodents that heritable stress coping strategies are characterized by individual differences in aggression (Benus, et al, 1991). Moreover, it has also been shown that aggressive individuals show exclusively proactive behaviour as a response to stress, while non-aggressive individuals can respond both reactively and proactively (Benus, et al, 1989). This latter point may offer in part an explanation of why the two different strains of rainbow trout in our study responded similarly to an aversive stimulus and sometimes they responded differently.…”
Section: Open Field Testsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…*At least P<0.05, pairwise comparisons (LSD test) following ANOVA challenges. For example, in the active avoidance test (Benus et al 1989) as well as in the defensive burying test , LAL mice show freezing behavior, while SAL mice show an active behavioral response by jumping to the other side of the cage (in the active avoidance test) and by burying the shock prod with bedding material (in the defensive burying test).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LAL mice display high immobility behavior, whereas SAL mice show high climbing and swimming behaviors (Veenema et al 2003b). These behavioral responses are representative of the "passive" coping style in LAL mice and the "active" coping style in SAL mice (Benus et al 1989(Benus et al , 1991aSluyter et al 1996). Others have shown that acute treatment with 5-HT 1A receptor agonists could effectively decrease immobility behavior in the FST (Wieland and Lucki 1990;Singh and Lucki 1993;Schreiber and De Vry 1993;Detke et al 1995;O'Neill and Conway 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to separate direct effects of the aversive stimulus from the psychological consequences of the punishment, we studied changes in cardiovascular and hormonal parameters in conditioned stress paradigms. The stress responses are determined by interactions between the environment (controllability/predictability), the properties of the stressor (quality, intensity, and duration), and individual differences in coping strategy (3,4,20,43).…”
Section: Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%