Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
High uncertainty in pore pressure trend possesses drilling challenges which pore pressure need to be updated and managed while drilling. The expected pore pressure trend includes pressure ramp and pressure regression in the area based on the offset well profile. Managing mud weight in this pore pressure is a challenging task without tool to update the pore pressure in real-time. Pressure ramp possesses risk of formation kick if mud weight is too low. In the regression trend, casing point to isolate the pressure regression interval need to be optimized. Uncertainty of casing point selection during regression trend could lead to significant overbalance and fracking of the formation. Updating pore pressure trend in real-time becomes critical in this drilling challenge. Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) and Logging-While-Drilling (LWD) formation testing (FT) are deployed to overcome the challenge of uncertain pore pressure. MPD static pore pressure testing (SPPT) with reducing surface back pressure (SBP) applied is performed to update the pore pressure ramp until max pressure depth where regression trend is expected. During regression trend, LWD FT is performed to acquire pore pressure while SBP is still applied to avoid the kick from max pressure trend above the regression point. Regression trend of pore pressure is updated till limit of differential pressure then section total depth (TD) is decided. After casing isolation from high pore pressure trend, drilling in deeper section is continued with lower mud-weight to optimize differential pressure till TD is achieved. Pore pressure increasing trend was updated with multiple MPD SPPT in multiple sands encountered in expected target layer and LWD FT acquired formation pressure in regression trend after each sand is encountered. Pore pressure trend is closely monitored to identify the regression trend until desired differential pressure is achieved. Casing point for intermediate section was decided which leads to lower mud weight in the deep section for better efficiency in the deep section. Planned TD was achieved by penetrating multiple sand in this appraisal/exploration (A/E) well despite of the uncertainty in pore pressure trend of pressure ramp and regression. Integration of MPD SPPT and LWD FT enabled pore pressure to be updated in both ramping and regression trend in real-time. Proven workflow with integration of MPD and LWD FT enable operators to drill through challenging formation pore pressure trend, uncertainty in drilling window and able to achieve target TD. Best practices of MPD and LWD operation in this pore pressure challenge could be applied for future drilling in the area with such pore pressure trend and thus able to manage the potential risk of drilling in such challenging environment.
High uncertainty in pore pressure trend possesses drilling challenges which pore pressure need to be updated and managed while drilling. The expected pore pressure trend includes pressure ramp and pressure regression in the area based on the offset well profile. Managing mud weight in this pore pressure is a challenging task without tool to update the pore pressure in real-time. Pressure ramp possesses risk of formation kick if mud weight is too low. In the regression trend, casing point to isolate the pressure regression interval need to be optimized. Uncertainty of casing point selection during regression trend could lead to significant overbalance and fracking of the formation. Updating pore pressure trend in real-time becomes critical in this drilling challenge. Managed Pressure Drilling (MPD) and Logging-While-Drilling (LWD) formation testing (FT) are deployed to overcome the challenge of uncertain pore pressure. MPD static pore pressure testing (SPPT) with reducing surface back pressure (SBP) applied is performed to update the pore pressure ramp until max pressure depth where regression trend is expected. During regression trend, LWD FT is performed to acquire pore pressure while SBP is still applied to avoid the kick from max pressure trend above the regression point. Regression trend of pore pressure is updated till limit of differential pressure then section total depth (TD) is decided. After casing isolation from high pore pressure trend, drilling in deeper section is continued with lower mud-weight to optimize differential pressure till TD is achieved. Pore pressure increasing trend was updated with multiple MPD SPPT in multiple sands encountered in expected target layer and LWD FT acquired formation pressure in regression trend after each sand is encountered. Pore pressure trend is closely monitored to identify the regression trend until desired differential pressure is achieved. Casing point for intermediate section was decided which leads to lower mud weight in the deep section for better efficiency in the deep section. Planned TD was achieved by penetrating multiple sand in this appraisal/exploration (A/E) well despite of the uncertainty in pore pressure trend of pressure ramp and regression. Integration of MPD SPPT and LWD FT enabled pore pressure to be updated in both ramping and regression trend in real-time. Proven workflow with integration of MPD and LWD FT enable operators to drill through challenging formation pore pressure trend, uncertainty in drilling window and able to achieve target TD. Best practices of MPD and LWD operation in this pore pressure challenge could be applied for future drilling in the area with such pore pressure trend and thus able to manage the potential risk of drilling in such challenging environment.
Enhancing hydrocarbon recovery from compartmentalized reservoirs in the Gulf of Thailand require a significant number of production wells, presenting challenges in finding an economically viable development strategy. To address these challenges, regional operators have perfected their operational expertise by adopting a statistical drilling approach, as opposed to an object-based drilling method because the reservoirs are so thin that they cannot be tracked reliably with seismic anomalies, and also known to be distributed almost randomly (Ionnikoff, et al. 2011). This strategy maximizes the likelihood of encountering hydrocarbons, following the Gulf of Thailand (GoT) Petroleum Model, while minimizing development costs through the Well Factory Standard (WFS) Drilling Approach (Kaeng, et al. 2016, Ionnikoff, et al. 2011, PTTEP 2020). It involves multi-stack targeting and commingled production plans, aiming to increase hydrocarbon encounters by drilling near faults (high and tight) and within statistically inferred intervals indicating new sands. Additionally, the modified-S well path enables quick drilling and cluster development, reducing costs (Figure 1). This GoT/WFS development strategy been effectively employed to enable marginal field development program (FDP) planning over the past few decades, turning a marginal prospect into an economic project. However, as production areas in the Gulf of Thailand continue to mature and the most accessible sands have already been extracted, advancements in automation and optimization are necessary to develop the remaining resources and reserves within the economic cutoffs. Manual preparation for a safe and resourceful FDP in mature development fields is often time-consuming and yields unoptimized outcomes. In recent years, our team has translated in-house knowledge and operational best-practice from the GoT/WFS model into mathematical equations, integrating them into our optimized and automated workflow. The core algorithm leverages Integer Linear Programming (ILP) to incorporate geological features and drilling criteria, to eventually provide a range of FDP scenarios. As projects advance to mature development stages, we developed optimization specifically for infill targeting functionality, which is the latest addition to our workflow (Chaipornkaew, et al. 2023). This represents a significant expansion from the initial focus on optimizing wellhead platform (WHP) placement only. The earlier work aimed to align optimal locations that are free of shallow anomalies with reachable targets, ensuring the shortest possible well paths (Ekkawong, et al. 2021). The combined efforts of the Chaipornkaew et al. (2023) studies and Ekkawong et al. (2021) studies, referred to as step-1 and step-2, have completed the automated workflow for FDP in mature fields, revolutionizing the FDP planning process in in the Gulf of Thailand. This system was tested in real pilot areas and has proven to be an efficient and optimized solution in complex regions with challenging fault systems and numerous existing wells. This paper focuses on enhancing our in-house and innovative workflow into a complete end-to-end solution. We focused on two key areas: algorithm improvement and plugin development, enabling our tooling to be fully functional across large-scale production areas. The algorithm improvements include automating fault polygon generation for input preparation and refining well paths for added output flexibility (referred to as step-0 and step-3 respectively). Furthermore, we tackled the challenges of managing data flow between common subsurface interpretation software and our tooling by developing plugin connectors. This is crucial for successful deployment and easy adoption, to successfully transition from a manual to a fully automated FDP process. Our tooling has gone through many iterations of algorithm improvements in the early phase of deployment through geologically diverse dataset. These solutions are now applicable to conceptual FDP in both exploration and development projects, significantly enhancing the value of mature and marginal fields across assets in the Gulf of Thailand.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.