2012
DOI: 10.4236/jilsa.2012.44033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Behind HumanBoost: Analysis of Users’ Trust Decision Patterns for Identifying Fraudulent Websites

Abstract: This paper analyzes users' trust decision patterns for detecting phishing sites. Our previous work proposed HumanBoost [1] which improves the accuracy of detecting phishing sites by using users' Past Trust Decisions (PTDs). Web users are generally required to make trust decisions whenever their personal information is requested by a website. HumanBoostassumed that a database of Web user's PTD would be transformed into a binary vector, representing phishing or not-phishing, and the binary vector can be used for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(15 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This past trust decision is used as new heuristic and incorporate this with the eight existing heuristics of AdaBoost and proved that this improve the detection accuracy for web user. Daisue Miayamoto et al [22] have analyzed users' rust decision patterns for detecting phising sites. This work identify the type of users whose past trust decision is useful for detecting phising sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This past trust decision is used as new heuristic and incorporate this with the eight existing heuristics of AdaBoost and proved that this improve the detection accuracy for web user. Daisue Miayamoto et al [22] have analyzed users' rust decision patterns for detecting phising sites. This work identify the type of users whose past trust decision is useful for detecting phising sites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous work [3], we asked 309 participants the reason of their decision. The participants browsed 14 simulated phishing sites and six legitimate sites, judging whether or not the site appeared to be a phishing site, and answered the reason for their decision via a questionnaire.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%