Being Constructive: Social Constructionism and the Environment

Abstract

Within environmental sociology realist critiques of the use of social constructionist approaches abound. This paper challenges features of the realist critique and emphasises the appeal and utility of social constructionist approaches for the study of environmental issues. We start by outlining the criticisms levelled at social constructionism, particularly the claim that the approach amounts to a denial of the existence of environmental problems and provides no contribution to managing them. We argue that this characterisation of `extreme' constructionism is problematic in two senses. First, in that it bears little resemblance to the mild approach actually used in the majority of empirical studies and, secondly, that it is a misleading characterisation of a more radical constructionism. We conclude that the utility of constructionism can be formulated in terms of two distinct approaches. One refrains from making overt moral and political claims, and treats such claims as topics for analysis; such an approach can, however, provide resources for social criticism. Another adopts an overtly political or environmentally motivated stance towards the issues investigated. Underlying these suggestions is our conviction that a particular model of engagement is implicit in many realist critiques and that others are possible, and perhaps, preferable.

Learning about Climate: An Exploration of the Socialization of Climate Change

“…While there have been critiques of the appropriateness of social constructionism to discuss environmental issues (Burningham and Cooper 1999), this is without consideration of the spectrum of constructionist thought (Jones 2002). This paper specifically aligns with a moderate or contextual form of social constructionism (Hannigan 1995;Milton 1996;Jones 2002), which while being epistemologically relativist does not contest the ontological reality of environmental issues.…”

Understanding the framings of climate change adaptation across multiple scales of governance in Europe

“…Naturally, there is also criticism of these approaches (Benton 1994, Dickens andFontana 1994). However, we takes the stance that social constructivist approaches convey an understanding of how interpretations of reality differ between groups (Burningham and Cooper 1999).…”

Where the wild things are: the evolving iconography of rural fauna

“…Although it has become commonplace to oppose social constructivist and realist approaches to the conceptualisation of nature within environmental sociology (Benton, 1993;Soper, 1995;Buttel, 2000, for a review of the debate see Franklin, 1999), both, as Tovey (2003 points out, run into difficulties when it comes to animals (see also Ingold, 1988). Are animals ''blank paper'' (Tester, 1992, p. 46) upon which humanity writes its own script, and even if we do intellectually conceptualise them as such does this necessarily deny them any independent existence (Burningham and Cooper, 1999)?…”